Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Pacquiao's camp flip-flopping (video)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by damned1974 View Post
    Like I said (thanks for proving my point), IMO Manny "agrees" to randomized testing WHILE FLOYD IS AWAY from the sport.When Floyd gets an opponent and returns to the sport,then Pac has an issue with USADA-sounds like posturing to me.
    Who is putting up the roadblocks when it comes to submitting to random drug testing? In fact, since Floyd has come back to boxing recently,when has Pac started to agree to random testing? Now the only thing you hear is Ariza saying they won't do the tests and say the fight is to be on Manny's terms.Are you sure it isn't YOU who has selective hearing????
    usada.. holy sh|t.. that fscking floyd attack dog when he first started this OST crusade?

    and what the hell? you're saying that it's not right for pac to try to coax out floyd from hiding when he's on vacation.. then where the hell was he before he fights ortiz? not in vacation anymore? really the your and your man-god's contradiction is staggering.. and your god only comes out AFTER pac have signed another fight.. and talk trash left and right about pac..

    Comment


    • Originally posted by dldwizard View Post
      usada.. holy sh|t.. that fscking floyd attack dog when he first started this OST crusade?

      and what the hell? you're saying that it's not right for pac to try to coax out floyd from hiding when he's on vacation.. then where the hell was he before he fights ortiz? not in vacation anymore? really the your and your man-god's contradiction is staggering.. and your god only comes out AFTER pac have signed another fight.. and talk trash left and right about pac..
      I don't view Floyd as a god...don't confuse the way I view a fighter as the way YOU view them.
      Manny has had several fights lined up without even negotiating or seeking a Floyd fight.You must have forgotten his Margarito shot that happened while they were "negotiating" a second time-remember,the one where Arum wasn't at! lmao

      Comment


      • Originally posted by damned1974 View Post
        Floyd showed the contract on his live stream. Why wasn't Manny's signature on it???? Weird for a guy who you claim agrees to drug testing.

        BTW-do you think everyone should give up 10,000,000 dollars per pound over the weight limit? Just curious,because Manny has come over weight in the past-weird that he would try to assert this in a contract with Floyd.
        oh really.. why not post pics of it here.. make if readable please.. although yes, its valid if any reputable boxing site wrote an article of it with every dotted i's and crossed t's is written in the article.. a picture of the signature would be awesome too.. i'd like to see where floyd signature have been and where pac have supposedly not signed.. but please, none of that floydhype.com site please.. then i'll shut my trap.. or else it's just chalk it up to your never ending delusion when it comes to everything that floyd says..
        Last edited by dldwizard; 09-28-2011, 02:14 AM.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by damned1974 View Post
          I don't view Floyd as a god...don't confuse the way I view a fighter as the way YOU view them.
          Manny has had several fights lined up without even negotiating or seeking a Floyd fight.You must have forgotten his Margarito shot that happened while they were "negotiating" a second time-remember,the one where Arum wasn't at! lmao
          so it's true.. you really are afflicted with that 'selective reading' syndrome.. there have been countless articles saying that pac tried to get floyd out of his vacation by agreeing to his testing request, thinking that it's the only hindrance for the fight not happening.. now you are saying pac never seeks for a floyd fight.. holy sh|t.. what the fsck is these articles talking about if not seeking for a fight against floyd..
          Last edited by dldwizard; 09-28-2011, 02:13 AM.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by damned1974 View Post
            Who is talking about racism? Why bring it up when it is the OST/negotiations we are debating???
            why are you so bothered that i mentioned the floyd camp making contradictory and racist statements? if you think his statements weren't racist, then that's your problem, not mine.

            Originally posted by damned1974 View Post
            When it comes to drug testing (the topic at hand),there is only one team with contradictions-tell me who it is.
            its team Pac/floyd.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by dldwizard View Post
              so it's true.. you really are afflicted with that 'selective reading' syndrome.. there have been countless articles saying that pac tried to get floyd out of his vacation by agreeing to his testing request, thinking that it's the only hindrance for the fight not happening.. now you are saying pac never seeks for a floyd fight.. holy sh|t.. what the fsck is these articles about if not seeking for a fight against floyd..
              Waiting for an answer still about the weight penalty.....I have a feeling I may be waiting a while-lol. With Manny agreeing to drug testing-I will believe it when I see it.I can afford to be a skeptic when Pac's team has flip flopped and lied on this subject.It must suck to be in the position of having to justify Pac's reaction to drug testing.Have a nice night!

              Comment


              • Originally posted by AFighter4U View Post
                why are you so bothered that i mentioned the floyd camp making contradictory and racist statements? if you think his statements weren't racist, then that's your problem, not mine.



                its team Pac/floyd.
                Not bothered at all. What we are talking about is the drug testing and negotiations,not personalities and character flaws.We could be here all day if you wanna talk about guys who claim to be with god while cheating on their wife and knocking up whores....(example)

                This debate isn't about morals or character,it is about the drug testing/negotiations. Do you understand why it is important to stick to the topic????

                Comment


                • what sucks is dealing with the huge contradictions that your man-god seems to create everytime he opens his mouth.. which leave you guys with the problem of how to twist 'facts' just to defend these contradictions.. have a good day.. and maybe next time, you'd be fair whenever you rode on your OST high horse again and call all boxers and not focus your fscking hatred on one man.. fscking hippos.. and yeah.. good day again!..

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by damned1974 View Post
                    Not bothered at all. What we are talking about is the drug testing and negotiations,not personalities and character flaws.We could be here all day if you wanna talk about guys who claim to be with god while cheating on their wife and knocking up whores....(example)

                    This debate isn't about morals or character,it is about the drug testing/negotiations. Do you understand why it is important to stick to the topic????
                    i'm actually sticking to the topic. i answered all your questions regarding the negotiations didn't i?

                    but sure. so you won't be bothered, please consider the other topic in question dropped.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by damned1974 View Post
                      Not bothered at all. What we are talking about is the drug testing and negotiations,not personalities and character flaws.We could be here all day if you wanna talk about guys who claim to be with god while cheating on their wife and knocking up whores....(example)

                      This debate isn't about morals or character,it is about the drug testing/negotiations. Do you understand why it is important to stick to the topic????
                      you really are a conflicted fellow.. in one statement you condemn one thing then totally contradicts what you've wrote in the next one.. and without subtlety at all..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP