Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Calzaghe Blasts Tarver: I Would Have Kicked Your Ass!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post
    Don't expect an answer to that.
    Yeah man, that really killed me.

    "Joe wanted to fight Tarver and instead, he fought the man that beat him"

    "LOL...NO he didnt!! STFU!"


    Yeah I got owned.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
      And why didnt he? He fought the man who compeltely outlclassed Tarver. So what is your basis for suggesting he would never fight the Great Tarver?

      We are talking about Antonio Tarver, yeh?
      You said he was going to fight Tarver if Antonio hadn't lost to Hopkins. Is that opinion or fact?

      Comment


      • #63
        Joe Calzaghe would have beat Tarver.

        Pretty much the story of his career.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
          You said he was going to fight Tarver if Antonio hadn't lost to Hopkins. Is that opinion or fact?
          I said Calzaghe wanted Tarver for his first fight at LHW but he lost to Hopkins. Its what he said. The fact that he fought Hopkins, the man who completely outclassed Tarver, suggests that its true. About the 10th time Ive stated my reasoning.

          What is your basis for saying he would never fight Tarver? 2nd time Ive asked.

          Oh wait....you dont answer questions. You just ask more. And more. And more. And drag out these lame arguments until people lose the will to live. And then you post some "holier than thou" response which is akin to say "he he I got the last word".

          Zzzz enjoy man. Im done here.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
            I said Calzaghe wanted Tarver for his first fight at LHW but he lost to Hopkins. Its what he said. The fact that he fought Hopkins, the man who completely outclassed Tarver, suggests that its true. About the 10th time Ive stated my reasoning.

            What is your basis for saying he would never fight Tarver? 2nd time Ive asked.

            Oh wait....you dont answer questions. You just ask more. And more. And more. And drag out these lame arguments until people lose the will to live. And then you post some "holier than thou" response which is akin to say "he he I got the last word".

            Zzzz enjoy man. Im done here.
            You've been done, man! Coming on here and passing off what Cazaghe probably said after the fact like it's truth. My basis for saying he would've never faced Tarver? It's my opinion. Kinda like the idea that he would've faced him. Only to you Joe saying it makes it gospel truth, huh?

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
              Joe Calzaghe would have beat Tarver.

              Pretty much the story of his career.
              He would've beat Wladimir Klitschko too. He was going to fight him but his retirement came first so that sorta screwed it up, you know?

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                You've been done, man! Coming on here and passing off what Cazaghe probably said after the fact like it's truth. My basis for saying he would've never faced Tarver? It's my opinion. Kinda like the idea that he would've faced him. Only to you Joe saying it makes it gospel truth, huh?
                Yes and we know how much weight your opinion holds.

                Fought Hopkins.

                But scared of the man Hopkins compeltely dominated!!!!

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                  Yes and we know how much weight your opinion holds.

                  Fought Hopkins.

                  But scared of the man Hopkins compeltely dominated!!!!
                  Well we all know how much Calzaghe means to you. You didn't even attribute a quote to him, or preface it with a "Calzaghe said." Just wrote, "He would've fought him if he hadn't lost" like that **** was pure fact!

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                    He would've beat Wladimir Klitschko too. He was going to fight him but his retirement came first so that sorta screwed it up, you know?


                    No but really, I think Calzaghe would have beaten Tarver, IMO.

                    IMO, he would have cleaned out the 168 Division of all contenders.

                    And after that he would have beaten Pavlik, Dawson, Froch, Tarver, etc etc.

                    He just didn't..

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Calzaghe is a bum. Yes he was undefeated, but who did he ever beat? To me his most impressive wins are over unbeaten Mikkel Kessler and Jeff Lacy. He totally avoided Tarver because a shell of Roy Jones, and an old Hopkins,(in my oppinion who beat Calzaghe) were bigger money fights. Tarver would have beaten him at 40, 35, or whenever. Calzaghe is one of the most overrated dudes there is in recent memory. He ducked Glen Johnson multiple times, and wanted no part of Tarver or Chad Dawson. **** Calzaghe.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP