How do you rate tysons ko victory over larry holmes ?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • crold1
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2005
    • 6354
    • 328
    • 122
    • 19,304

    #41
    Originally posted by madmanc321
    People dont give tyson the credit he deserves for this fight imo.people say holmes was shot yet 4 years later he beat an undefeated ray mercer handily then 6 months later gave a prime holyfield hell for 12 rounds,plus the fact he is the only man to ko holmes.
    Holmes's jaw was granite,he took the best shavers had and got back to his feet.
    If only tyson didnt lose his head,and the people around him who kept him in check.the man was a perfect fighting machine in his rooney days
    Given what Holmes would do later, and that it's his only stop loss, it merits high. However, the layoff of Holmes coming in and the relatively short camp he had to work the rust off take away from the win a bit.

    It was a solid crossroads win no matter how sliced, but open to wild under and over rating both ways.

    Comment

    • Poet682006
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2007
      • 17924
      • 1,181
      • 1,350
      • 26,849

      #42
      Originally posted by ManchesterMike
      Exactly, Tyson was already on a downward spiral before he lost to Douglas (who don't forget was down for longer than ten in the fight).
      Given the right people around him Mike would have retired unbeaten and would be now regarded as the greatest Heavyweight of all time. Of this I have no doubt.
      Nuthuggery at it's most blatant.

      Comment

      • Poet682006
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Mar 2007
        • 17924
        • 1,181
        • 1,350
        • 26,849

        #43
        Originally posted by madmanc321
        People dont give tyson the credit he deserves for this fight imo.people say holmes was shot yet 4 years later he beat an undefeated ray mercer handily then 6 months later gave a prime holyfield hell for 12 rounds,plus the fact he is the only man to ko holmes.
        Holmes's jaw was granite,he took the best shavers had and got back to his feet.
        If only tyson didnt lose his head,and the people around him who kept him in check.the man was a perfect fighting machine in his rooney days
        This subject has already been addressed in the following thread:

        Comment

        • nomadman
          Eurasian gonna get you
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2009
          • 4336
          • 243
          • 532
          • 10,656

          #44
          Originally posted by Ben Bolt
          For sure, Iron Mike was helluva puncher.

          Though, Tyson opponents who've also met Shavers and Foreman say that their punches hurt a lot more.
          The devastating effects Tyson's punches had, they refer to his speed. They never saw them coming.
          A punch which hurts more doesn't necessarily mean it's doing more damage.

          Comment

          • nomadman
            Eurasian gonna get you
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jan 2009
            • 4336
            • 243
            • 532
            • 10,656

            #45
            Originally posted by jreckoning
            For me, prime Holmes was 1978-1983.

            He just happeened to meet a prime Tyson in 1988.

            So for me the win is ok not earth shattering or great.

            I feel like you have to look at when they fought, rather than what box rec says.

            For me, his Cooney fight was Holmes masterpiece.
            I'd go with this. Holmes wasn't at his best, conditioning wise, and ring rusty, when he fought Tyson, but as later fights showed his age shouldn't be held up as a factor in the loss.

            Comment

            • nomadman
              Eurasian gonna get you
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jan 2009
              • 4336
              • 243
              • 532
              • 10,656

              #46
              Originally posted by ManchesterMike
              Lets not forget that Holmes took the fight at short notice, even given that Tyson would have won if they were both at their peak age or condition.

              Tyson at his peak would have beaten any heavyweight in history other than Ali who would have danced around him and jabbed him to death for 15 rounds.
              And please don't mention those big russians, Tyson would have got under their long range jabs and knocked them out with upper cuts, easy, no problem, too quick, too fast, too strong, too skillful, too much class and no steroids either, Mike was all natural power.
              How do you know this for certain?

              Comment

              • Poet682006
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Mar 2007
                • 17924
                • 1,181
                • 1,350
                • 26,849

                #47
                Originally posted by It's Ovah
                I'd go with this. Holmes wasn't at his best, conditioning wise, and ring rusty, when he fought Tyson, but as later fights showed his age shouldn't be held up as a factor in the loss.

                Comment

                • The Noose
                  AKA Bologna Panini
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Aug 2004
                  • 12082
                  • 1,040
                  • 825
                  • 44,455

                  #48
                  Originally posted by poet682006
                  This subject has already been addressed in the following thread:
                  Almost every subject has been discussed before.


                  Anyway, i think it was one of tysons best wins. Holmes was well past it, and rusty, but still showed ring smarts, still had a great chin, and was able to frustrate Tyson for a while.

                  Tyson never really had a truly great win. But he showed in this fight all it takes from him is the right punch at the right time. He also showed he wasnt just a KO boxer, but he would out work his opponents.

                  Tysons career is full of 'what if's' and excuses, but they are valid imo.

                  Comment

                  • betmen
                    Indonesian
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 4763
                    • 310
                    • 254
                    • 28,570

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Spit Venom
                    Homles wasnt peak, still world class victory.

                    man, that ****star in your avi, who is she??
                    is she have nice rear??? she so cute.

                    Comment

                    • check hook
                      Gay Pride
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jan 2010
                      • 9361
                      • 379
                      • 137
                      • 16,005

                      #50
                      Originally posted by Forza
                      It's sad the midget's best win was over a 39 year old washed up inactive for 2 years ali wannabe


                      Tyson has fought better opposition than Wlad and Vitali combined, so you're really not making a case for their greatness with these ridiculous comments.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP