Personally? When I'm in serious boxing fan mode, I despise the concept of "ruin".
Because I believe that fighters are changed in two ways:
1) Internally - confidence, realization loss of sense of invincibility, newfound gunshyness, etc.
2) Externally - future competition sees a blueprint or design that they can also exploit. Or they see a pattern of general decline and use that opportunity to step in.
J-Ro and I share an (unnatural) mancrush on Tito. And the closest I would come to saying one fighter "ruined" another would be Tito/Vargas.
I could say Tito/Reid, because that 11th round was hellish. But I don't think that Reid was ever that good a pro, and that fight just came too early.
When one fighter suffers a career-changing or threatening injury (detached retina), I guess you can say he ws "ruined".
Because I believe that fighters are changed in two ways:
1) Internally - confidence, realization loss of sense of invincibility, newfound gunshyness, etc.
2) Externally - future competition sees a blueprint or design that they can also exploit. Or they see a pattern of general decline and use that opportunity to step in.
J-Ro and I share an (unnatural) mancrush on Tito. And the closest I would come to saying one fighter "ruined" another would be Tito/Vargas.
I could say Tito/Reid, because that 11th round was hellish. But I don't think that Reid was ever that good a pro, and that fight just came too early.
When one fighter suffers a career-changing or threatening injury (detached retina), I guess you can say he ws "ruined".
Comment