Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Team Margarito: If Cotto Wants 150, Let Him Go To 147

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by LeadUppercut View Post
    Listen to yourself willya ?

    * " which is why he fought Cotto but not Martinez "

    * " he made Cotto only come down 2pounds "

    * " He made Margarito come down 4 "

    Were you actually attempting to defend Pac with those comments ?

    FACT: True champions do not attempt to disadvantage their opponents.

    Tell me something.....
    ..... why would a true P4P fighter need a catch-weight ?

    I will wait.....
    No I made a point. He said Pac fought Margo to avoid sergio. If he believes that then u can say say manny also fought cotto instead of martinez. He made an idiotic statement

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Mr. Fantastic View Post
      It's not hard to see that Pac is and there can be a debate with Mayweather/Hopkins. Laugh all you want but I'm not a *******, hell I don't like his catch-weight bullcrap either but like I said, the picking on the small guys and making some go up more than one division is just as bad as the catch-weight.

      HOpkins' middleweight reign was decent and a great thing to do but you should give Calzaghe and Ottke the same treatment.
      That is absurd, and I am laughing.

      It is also absurd to mention Ottke and Hopkins in the same sentence.

      Pacquiao has done NOTHING since 2008, except feed on old men, faded champions, and bums. Not only that, he either manipulates advantages or he disadvantages his opponents on the scale.

      Why the *** would a genuine P4P fighter require a catch-weight ?

      And not only is his resume manufactured, it is likely fraudulent as well.

      At least Hopkins will take the test and prove that his accomplishments are legit.

      Your " theory " requires a HUGE amount of " faith ".

      Sorry, but I dont do " faith ", when it comes to boxing.

      Your " theory " requires that.....

      Pac COULD have beaten JMM in a rematch at 130, even though he did not.

      Pac COULD have beaten a decent lightweight, even though he did not.

      Pac COULD have beaten a decent JWW, even though he did not.

      Pac COULD have beaten Hoya at 154, even though he did not.

      Pac COULD have beaten Cotto at 147, even though he did not.

      Pac COULD have beaten cheato at 154, even though he did not.

      Pac COULD have beaten a genuine JMW, even though he did not.

      Pac COULD have beaten Mosley back when Shane was ranked #1, even though he did not.

      Pac COULD have beaten Ortiz, even though he did not.

      Pac COULD have beaten Mayweather, even though he did not.

      Giving Manny credit for things that he " could " have done, reeks of *******ation.

      Kool-aid on the house.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by LeadUppercut View Post
        That is absurd, and I am laughing.

        It is also absurd to mention Ottke and Hopkins in the same sentence.

        Pacquiao has done NOTHING since 2008, except feed on old men, faded champions, and bums. Not only that, he either manipulates advantages or he disadvantages his opponents on the scale.

        Why the *** would a genuine P4P fighter require a catch-weight ?

        And not only is his resume manufactured, it is likely fraudulent as well.

        At least Hopkins will take the test and prove that his accomplishments are legit.

        Your " theory " requires a HUGE amount of " faith ".

        Sorry, but I dont do " faith ", when it comes to boxing.

        Your " theory " requires that.....

        Pac COULD have beaten JMM in a rematch at 130, even though he did not.

        Pac COULD have beaten a decent lightweight, even though he did not.

        Pac COULD have beaten a decent JWW, even though he did not.

        Pac COULD have beaten Hoya at 154, even though he did not.

        Pac COULD have beaten Cotto at 147, even though he did not.

        Pac COULD have beaten cheato at 154, even though he did not.

        Pac COULD have beaten a genuine JMW, even though he did not.

        Pac COULD have beaten Mosley back when Shane was ranked #1, even though he did not.

        Pac COULD have beaten Ortiz, even though he did not.

        Pac COULD have beaten Mayweather, even though he did not.

        Giving Manny credit for things that he " could " have done, reeks of *******ation.

        Kool-aid on the house.
        FACT: Mayweather is undefeated, and is currently contracted to fight the third consecutive opponent that Pacquiao ducked first.

        The only other name that can be mentioned alongside Hopkins is Mayweather.

        Hopkins shades him because of his record middleweight reign, and because of his string of upset victories over highly favored opponents.

        It is fkn ridiculous that you could credit Pacquiao over Hopkins when Manny only fights little old ladies.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by LeadUppercut View Post
          FACT: Mayweather is undefeated, and is currently contracted to fight the third consecutive opponent that Pacquiao ducked first.

          The only other name that can be mentioned alongside Hopkins is Mayweather.

          Hopkins shades him because of his record middleweight reign, and because of his string of upset victories over highly favored opponents.

          It is fkn ridiculous that you could credit Pacquiao over Hopkins when Manny only fights little old ladies.
          >.> Please, you're making yourself look really bad now. You can't even talk about who Manny hasn't ducked and bring up Floyd. Manny hasn't done much since '08? He FOUGHT guys Floyd never did, catchweight or not he stepped in the ring Mayweather can't muster up the balls to even do that much.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View Post
            >.> Please, you're making yourself look really bad now. You can't even talk about who Manny hasn't ducked and bring up Floyd. Manny hasn't done much since '08? He FOUGHT guys Floyd never did, catchweight or not he stepped in the ring Mayweather can't muster up the balls to even do that much.
            What, the old "Mayweather ducked Cotto and Margarito" thing ?

            Get real.

            FACT: Cotto ducked Mayweather TWICE, once at 140, and once when he first moved to welter. Arum stated that he wasnt ready for Mayweather.

            And who cares about that worn-out old joke Margarito, seriously

            He is the only fighter in recent history who is more over-rated than Pacquiao.

            It is ridiculous to insinuate that choosing the Baldomir>Hoya path was a duck.

            Margarito did actually get close to forcing the issue on that one, except he lost..... NO, not to Shane, to Paul Williams.

            FACT: Mayweather is undefeated, and is currently contracted to fight the third consecutive opponent that Pacquiao ducked first.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View Post
              >.> Please, you're making yourself look really bad now. You can't even talk about who Manny hasn't ducked and bring up Floyd. Manny hasn't done much since '08? He FOUGHT guys Floyd never did, catchweight or not he stepped in the ring Mayweather can't muster up the balls to even do that much.
              You are nuts if you think that cheato could have beaten Mayweather.

              Go and watch the Corrales fight.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by fastblack View Post
                cotto doesn't want to fight margo and get battered again and embarrassed even killed. cotto is afraid of dying in the ring. the little cotto the shrimp is scared and will pull out watch what happens.
                Did you watch Marg's last two fights? Kill Cotto? Please say that you are just being sarcastic, you sound like you are lacking in the common sense dept.

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP