Comments Thread For: Mayweather: Forget Money, Pacquiao Must Be Tested

[tredh]

All this testing talk does one major thing for Floyd- it turns him into the hero and Pacquiao into the villian. This is significant.

As for the bit, Pacquiao "became great after 25", this is really evidence that Floyd simply doesn't understand just what Manny is. The simple fact is, Manny has been an exciting and captivating fighter since day one. Since day one! He was a huge deal in Asia, but of course (and I hate to say it) ignorant Americans (like floyd) who can't even find the Phillipinnes on a map wouldn't know who or what was turning heads in Asia.

Look at Pacquiao's first fight in the U.S.---vs Ledwaba. The dude was a champion, only one loss, tough as nails- Pacquiao took the fight on two weeks notice- Vegas wouldn't even take bets on the fight, that's how much of an underdog Pacquiao was. And what did he do? Broke the champ's nose, knocked him down, knocked him out and took his belt. That's who Manny is- since day one. And he's only became better as he's become a student of the game.

Floyd just doesn't know his history and is banking that his fans don't either. Ignorance is bliss and loves company.

Don't write Manny's story as you want to tell it. Cause no fighter was a huge deal in any country getting KO'ed twice off of body shots. That was Manny from day 1. Manny came back from those like good fighter should and that can't be disputed but don't try to write his story and leave that part of it out.

Now you may continue with your praise of Manny.

[| THE KING |]

All this testing talk does one major thing for Floyd- it turns him into the hero and Pacquiao into the villian. This is significant.

As for the bit, Pacquiao "became great after 25", this is really evidence that Floyd simply doesn't understand just what Manny is. The simple fact is, Manny has been an exciting and captivating fighter since day one. Since day one! He was a huge deal in Asia, but of course (and I hate to say it) ignorant Americans (like floyd) who can't even find the Phillipinnes on a map wouldn't know who or what was turning heads in Asia.

Look at Pacquiao's first fight in the U.S.---vs Ledwaba. The dude was a champion, only one loss, tough as nails- Pacquiao took the fight on two weeks notice- Vegas wouldn't even take bets on the fight, that's how much of an underdog Pacquiao was. And what did he do? Broke the champ's nose, knocked him down, knocked him out and took his belt. That's who Manny is- since day one. And he's only became better as he's become a student of the game.

Floyd just doesn't know his history and is banking that his fans don't either. Ignorance is bliss and loves company.

Summed it up well...

[WESS]

didnt floyd fought a bloated lightweight in marquez just a couple of years ago??

but hey lets ignore the FACT that pac fought marquez in his OWN weight division....twice!!

Exactly... and now Pac is fighting JMM in the WW division.

Walked right in to that one didn't ya?

[punchmehard]

Translation: Why Pac with HIGH risk when I can fight those I can beat then earn a lot. I thought he is called Floyd "MONEY" Mayweather and now he is saying its not about the MONEY? He is now Floyd "OST" Mayweather. This only shows his true colors.

From Pretty Boy Mayweather to Money Mayweather to OST Mayweather.

[LupinIII]

LOL please spin it more please....

LOL @ ****in stans!

spin what?

hasn't Arum repeated this several times?they want WADA code but the USADA is biased who does the test than?

tell me what im missing here?

[punchmehard]

Don't write Manny's story as you want to tell it. Cause no fighter was a huge deal in any country getting KO'ed twice off of body shots. That was Manny from day 1. Manny came back from those like good fighter should and that can't be disputed but don't try to write his story and leave that part of it out.

Now you may continue with your praise of Manny.

You are hateful. Many greats lost in the early part of their career. It seems you are criticizing someone you don't actually know the history of. What I call you is IGNORANT. Your arguement says that if a fighter loses in the early part of his career he can't be great which is the most ****** thing I have ever read in this post next to the imaginary Japanese chick of yesir.

[SkillspayBills]

It's as simple as that then make he fight in May or STFU and stop talking about each other. WHATABUNCHADIVAS!

[-MAKAVELLI-]

now PAC is gonna ask for 70-30

[joelab75]

Shane never tested positive then what? what happened to him his career? did it help him become ATG? a fighter of the decade? fighter of the year? was he ever considered one of the best? how many boxers have used PEDS? so PEDS basically works only with Pac? according to *****S.

[tatangb45]

He wants to get into triangle theories...

The facts are that the last 4 fighters Pac has faced have come off there worst performances in there career.

Mayweather on the other hand has fought 4 top guys coming off KO's and now Ortiz who's coming off his best win of his career. 4 Champions and now the current WBC WW Champion.

Another perspective is that none of Pac's latest opposition looked like Mosley or Ortiz in there last outing.

Triangle theories? Dude, that's nothing more but another desperate attempt to save Floyd's butt.

When you can't show a single fighter in Floyd's entire WW career who can beat anyone in Pac's list, your triangle theory no longer holds any validity. If you can't accept this, then one has to wonder if you really know something about boxing.

Btw, Dlh should have been added to Pac's list since that was fought at WW. You can take out Margo if that will make you somewhat happier. But remember, Pac weighed in at WW for that fight.