Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Boxer-Puncher beats a Pure Boxer

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
    i wish i could be czar of boxing.

    i'd change the weight divisions.

    heavyweight 221+
    cruiserweight 201-220
    middleweight 161-175
    welterweight 148-160
    lightweight - 136-147
    featherweight - 127-135
    bantamweight - 119-126
    flyweight - -118

    I was cool with the 8 original weight divisions

    plus cruiser would be cool.

    108.115,122,130, 140,154, 168 those can go away.... ha ha ha ha.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by jreckoning View Post
      I was cool with the 8 original weight divisions

      plus cruiser would be cool.

      108.115,122,130, 140,154, 168 those can go away.... ha ha ha ha.
      8 divisions is enough.

      you don't need a division for every 4-5 lbs.

      every 8 or more lbs. is good.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by sweetscience18 View Post
        Actually the boxer usually comes out on top in big fights..

        Ali did
        SRL did
        Bowe did
        Lewis did

        The term boxer puncher is normally used to describe someone with incomplete boxing skills. To fight a complete boxer you cant expect to win by not matching them in skills but by making up for it with pubching power...not when that fighter has a good chin and defense anyway.


        Thats my opinion anyway...The boxer.
        I'm an Ali fan, but i should admit he lost to a prime Fraizier, and Leonard lost to Duran...

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by GrandpaBernard View Post
          According to you manny is also a boxer-puncher just like Marquez, we all remember Marquez getting taken to school by the boxer, Floyd, hard.
          Marquez has developed into a boxer-punch in the last few year, he has been a pure-boxer for most of his career.

          The boxer-puncher has power advantage over the pure boxer, but because Marquez was a career feather who had stepped up 3 divisions in just over a year, the power edge was not his.

          This formula only works in fair fights

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by sweetscience18 View Post
            I was talking about matchups between boxers and boxer punchers..just because you ar.e a boxer does not mean you dont have a hard punch its your technical abilities that make you a boxer.

            Ali also beat frazier twice..and also beat many boxer punchers.
            SRL beat Hearns one of the best boxer punchers of all time.
            SRR was the definition of a boxer! Just because you are powerful does not mean you arent a boxer.


            Shane mosley is a boxer puncher for example..what happened when he faced forrest and floyd, both boxers?

            And a pressure fighter is the key to beating a boxer and vice versa.

            Been in boxing gyms my whole life and trust me theperson with the best technical skills and timing is the one who has the most potential to win any matchup.
            SRL was a boxer-puncher SRR was a boxer puncher. When Mosley fought Mayweather he was a slugger, only had the big punch left. Worked well against the swarmer Margarito

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by DempseyRollin View Post
              ppl are forgetting the best example p4p wise withing the last 20 yrs. jcc should have lost to pernell whitaker.

              boxer-puncher loses to boxer.

              in other words, it doesnt always go the way u claim it does.
              Chavez was not a boxer-puncher, swarmer/slugger and he was past his prime then.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by sweetscience18 View Post
                I think the TS is just trying to say manny beats floyd..
                All of a sudden guys like SRL Lennox Lewis SRR arent boxers just because they knock people out....
                They are boxer-punchers.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by Spray_resistant View Post
                  style differentials are not a formulas for winners, better fighters impose their style on inferior ones.

                  As stated in the first post I said fighter of similar ability.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by Deevel916 View Post
                    If a guy like Mayorga can beat a pure boxer like Vernon Forrest twice!.....then anything can happen in boxing. There is no one style that will always beat another style.
                    Forrest is a boxer-puncher and Maryorga is a slugger.

                    Sluggers beat boxer-punchers.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by americanbot View Post
                      thread fails from the start.

                      pac is a volume ambush fighter not a boxer puncher.........

                      kendall holt is a "boxer puncher"

                      volume ambush fighters are calzaghie, khan, pac.

                      the way to beat pac is good legs, good head movement, good counter punching. this takes the volume away & they find themselves following you not throwing much of any punches (while being outpointed & outboxed) pac was doing this even in the mosley bout (walking in & not throwing) it's just that mosley wasn't quick enough to catch pac while he was walking in throwing less & less punches. mayweather is a TOTALLY different creature in this regard & will be licking his chops at the opportunities to counter pac.
                      Calzaghe could be seen as a swarmer.

                      Khan is a boxer-puncher, Khan had real trouble with Maidana and lost to Prescott. Sluggers beat boxer punchers.

                      Pacquiao is a boxer puncher.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP