Boxer-Puncher beats a Pure Boxer
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Could you put together a thoroughly researched compilation of fights that support your thesis, for me to read when i wake up?
The sample have to be sufficiently large to not be discredited by simple variance.
Would appreciate it.
Love,
HarryComment
-
SRL was the boxer-puncher Benitez was the pure boxer.That's because Benitez could match Leonard's boxing skills and hold his own in the middle of the ring (hes still regarded as one of the best counter punchers in history). Can't say the same for Pacquaio, who is out classed against Mayweather in terms of pure skill, and without a question would be befuddled if the fight was 100% technical. He was actually technically outclassed by Marquez (who actually won more rounds) but his work rate, speed and power allowed him to get by.Comment
-
Back in his superfeather days Floyd was a boxer-punch but his style has developed into a pure boxer's one now.
Pacquiao was a swarmer back in the day but with slugger power, but he has developed into a boxer-puncher.Comment
-
Comment
-
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...php?p=10900593
This site for one.
Manny as all the traits of an boxer-punch, but he can slug, swarm and be a pure boxer also and his uniqueness could put him in the unorthodox category.
You say that he is WIDLEY regarding as a boxer-puncher and then link me to a one of your threads with a poll? Dude, cut it out.Comment
-
well if the boxer can win more rounds he can win more rounds
the puncher always has the option of winning... the other way
you don't need an early lead
you can come from behind
the boxer / puncher doesn't always win fights
but he's certainly better off than the pure boxer
its more work to be more effective with your punches if you cant hit hard
and you''re basically limited to one gearComment
Comment