Greater Ring Intelligence: MAYWEATHER or pacquiao?

[Kenny MF Powers]

Still waiting for the ts to define ring intelligence. In addition, kindly give your reasons why you still believe that Floyd has a higher RI than Pac. Make sure you cite certifiable examples, like something in his resume that we can compare to Pac's, to support your assertions.
I would likewise recommend that you stay away from the gibberish nonsense like what punchesnbunches had posted. Boxing is not like the belief in a Creator where the mere act of believing is enough.

[IMG]http://gadgetsteria.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/******ed.jpg[/IMG]

[Gino Ros]

only person on that list who has an argument is bhop. this coming from the biggest winky fan there is. floyd adapts wayyyy better than either marquez or winky.

Probably the best example of distance control I've seen in the past generation was Trinidad/Winky.

Now, keep in mind that I was the biggest possible Tito nuthugger. So it was painful for me to watch. But Winky's tactical mastery in that fight was amazing.

[hitem27]

is this a trick question lol, mayweather has the best ring iq of all time

[Mr. Philadel]

the smarter fighter don't ALWAYS win....Sam Peter is no where close to James Toney when it comes to ring IQ...JT is not on B.Hop's level....and Ricardo Mayarga can keep learning but he will NEVER know more than the late great Vernon Forrest....see where I'm going?!?

[PunchesNbuncheS]

If you read carefully what you wrote, you will see that your fourth paragraph is the exact description of Pac's ring intelligence.

I dont have to read it carefully, I wrote it, I obviously know what it says. Ok, since you obviously read it very very carefully then lets break it down. Lets break down that fourth paragraph that you are trying to somehow try and spin to your advantage.

First of all, calm down, relax OK. Dont get your panties in a bunch. Talking about Im talking gibberish? If thats what you call the truth then you got bigger problems than losing arguments on Boxingscene. Look buddy, I can tell that you love Pac and I mean LOVE Pac, like you are on of those guys that would take the blame for his farts in public. Now that we got that straight and we both know who we are lets commence the debate.

You seem to be under the impression that I somehow dont believe that Pac has any ring intelligence, at least thats what your little quote up above is getting at right? Well, you my blind, biased little buddy have got ahead of yourself and ASSUMED that I believe that Pac has no ring IQ.

I know Pac has some ring IQ, I know he is smarter than some people give him credit for, BUT the question wasnt whether Pac has ring intelligence or not, it was "GREATER RING INTELLIGENCE: MAYWEATHER OR PACQUIAO?" So you see, since the question was who has more ring IQ out of both fighters then obviously its Floyd.

[PunchesNbuncheS]

If you read carefully what you wrote, you will see that your fourth paragraph is the exact description of Pac's ring intelligence.

If you had read as carefully as you are telling others to read you would have noticed that the title of the thread says..................................

"GREATER RING INTELLIGENCE: MAYWEATHER OR PACQUIAO?

Not "Does Pac have any ring intelligence?"

[PunchesNbuncheS]

Still waiting for the ts to define ring intelligence. In addition, kindly give your reasons why you still believe that Floyd has a higher RI than Pac. Make sure you cite certifiable examples, like something in his resume that we can compare to Pac's, to support your assertions.
I would likewise recommend that you stay away from the gibberish nonsense like what punchesnbunches had posted. Boxing is not like the belief in a Creator where the mere act of believing is enough.

You seem to be really upset that 65 people have common sense and 2 good eyes and that only 5 diehards actually had the balls to point themselves out as "not to be taken serious types" on the poll.

You know whats funny to me? That as passionate as you are at trying to defend your biased and just plain horrible and ridiculous point of view, you didnt even have the balls to vote on the "PUBLIC POLL" where we can all see who votes and for who.

Whats wrong? You can sit here and blindly try and defend your comments but you wont fully commit and vote that Pac has more ring IQ than Floyd? Why is that, maybe because you know thats bull****?

Youre just like Puga. You cheerleaders blindly defend Pac and make some of the most ridiculous comments Ive ever seen and even post on threads with polls like this one defending your GOD but wont have the balls to vote on the poll for fear of looking even dumber than you already do.

Let me ask you a question and if youre man enough or just an honest answer, (**** it Ill settle for an honest answer if youre capable of providing one).............................................. .......................................

WHO HAS GREATER RING INTELLIGENCE: FLOYD OR PAC??????????? AND VOTE ON THE POLL!!!


The ball is in you court!

[Everywhere]

I don't really mind tatang...yeah hes a nuthugger for sure, but his posts are generally well thought out and legible compared to an idiot like puga or sugar sting ray.

[Gino Ros]

If you had read as carefully as you are telling others to read you would have noticed that the title of the thread says..................................

"GREATER RING INTELLIGENCE: MAYWEATHER OR PACQUIAO?

Not "Does Pac have any ring intelligence?"

That is why I stopped engaging him. He doesn't understand relativism.

Only a Sith thinks in absolutes.

[Gino Ros]

You know whats funny to me? That as passionate as you are at trying to defend your biased and just plain horrible and ridiculous point of view, you didnt even have the balls to vote on the "PUBLIC POLL" where we can all see who votes and for who.

Whats wrong? You can sit here and blindly try and defend your comments but you wont fully commit and vote that Pac has more ring IQ than Floyd? Why is that, maybe because you know thats bull****?

Wait - he didn't even vote?