Brewster is the best right now

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bozo_no no
    Palabras de Piedra
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2005
    • 8906
    • 416
    • 496
    • 16,069

    #61
    Originally posted by McKay 1
    Do you believe that Ruiz would beat Vitali Klitschko? I dont think you answer yes because it would be an embarrasment. Like I said at the current time no fighter would in as the favorite against Vitali hence he is the #1 heavyweight.

    Agian with the "What ifs"

    You're not saying anything.

    The biggest question is what fights will actually get made? There's a lot of politics, and who is the best when no one has proven anything to date will hinge on what happens.

    You can take all the polls you want, results are what matters.

    It's all up in the air right now, there are a bunch of fights to be made, and who will beat who and move on to fight the other winners is what's going to determine a #1.

    Not a poll and an essay as to why contest.

    Comment

    • Truth
      Old School Member
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2004
      • 18228
      • 578
      • 409
      • 30,780

      #62
      Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
      How can you say that?

      When was the last time Rahman won an important fight or looked impressive?

      Rahman lost clearly and thoroughly to John Ruiz.

      Did that impress and make Ruiz more credible?

      Rahman looked awful agaisnt Barrett (he just didn't look as bad as Barrett).

      He's a limited and plodding fighter who is currently 5th at Heavyweight at best.

      What a Rahman win would be for Vitali, is the best win on his resume.

      But the question that begs to be asked is how much does that really say?
      I am not saying that a win vs. Rahman makes Vitali, Ali or anything I just think it would prove he is #1 at heavy. But I am going to be honest, I think James Toney is the best fighter at heavyweight right now.

      Comment

      • beez721
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Aug 2005
        • 9637
        • 252
        • 55
        • 16,400

        #63
        Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
        Then who is?

        Vitali who since losing to Lewis in 2002 has just 3 fights agasint competition inferior to Brewsters?

        Byrd who's been just as inactive as Vitali and struggled against sub par opposition?

        Please.

        You're a Klitschko cheerleader, and you only involve yourself in these topics to cheer.


        Brewster is defintalty one of the top guys in the division at the moment.

        He's one of 4 title holders who all haven't been acitve or impressive.
        nice try clown. the problem isnt me,,,its you. youre a klit hater/brewster nuthugger. your saying that brewsters comp has been better than vitali's? thats laughable. golota is a mental midget and krasniqui is a journeyman who's beaten no one and got bombed out by another bum saleta. danny williams,,,and corrie sanders would both knock out golota and krasniqi. vit has also beaten larry donald and kirk johnson who are both more talented than anyone brewster has beaten. get over it

        Comment

        • McKay 1
          Entity
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Sep 2005
          • 864
          • 62
          • 55
          • 7,438

          #64
          Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
          Agian with the "What ifs"

          You're not saying anything.

          The biggest question is what fights will actually get made? There's a lot of politics, and who is the best when no one has proven anything to date will hinge on what happens.

          You can take all the polls you want, results are what matters.

          It's all up in the air right now, there are a bunch of fights to be made, and who will beat who and move on to fight the other winners is what's going to determine a #1.
          Not a poll and an essay as to why contest.
          There is no what if. It simple question as to the result of heavyweight unification bout. It is broken down the highest form of simplicity . It is 10/20=1/2 you want to turn what is such simplicity into negative decimal calculations to avoid a 1 vs 1 answer. And a question of relavance at that. The movites of your action? Well it clearly evidences the fact you are something other than a boxing purist.
          Last edited by McKay 1; 10-12-2005, 09:36 PM.

          Comment

          • Manny_P
            Knicks/Yankees/Giants
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2005
            • 8966
            • 542
            • 799
            • 19,102

            #65
            Originally posted by beez721
            nice try clown. the problem isnt me,,,its you. youre a klit hater/brewster nuthugger. your saying that brewsters comp has been better than vitali's? thats laughable. golota is a mental midget and krasniqui is a journeyman who's beaten no one and got bombed out by another bum saleta. danny williams,,,and corrie sanders would both knock out golota and krasniqi. vit has also beaten larry donald and kirk johnson who are both more talented than anyone brewster has beaten. get over it
            you're basically sayin Wlad Klitsczchckhzchko is garbage. LOL!!!!!!

            He's in Brewster's bag if you dint know!!!!! It would seem (TO ME) that Wlad is betta than all of Vitali's opposition in ta past.

            Go get a marker and write yo forehead a big :Pwnage from me. nyahahahahaha!

            Comment

            • Bozo_no no
              Palabras de Piedra
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2005
              • 8906
              • 416
              • 496
              • 16,069

              #66
              Originally posted by beez721
              nice try clown. the problem isnt me,,,its you. youre a klit hater/brewster nuthugger. your saying that brewsters comp has been better than vitali's? thats laughable. golota is a mental midget and krasniqui is a journeyman who's beaten no one and got bombed out by another bum saleta. danny williams,,,and corrie sanders would both knock out golota and krasniqi. vit has also beaten larry donald and kirk johnson who are both more talented than anyone brewster has beaten. get over it

              I realize this just goes over your head and encourages you to spout more of you non sense,

              but trying to act like fighting Corrie Sanders and Danny Williams since the begining of 04 isn't a competition level that solidifies someone as #1 in a division this wide open.

              The fact you'd say that they're better competition that Krasniqi and Golota is a joke in itself.

              You're just another guy who's a complete waste in these discussions.

              I never once said Brewster is the best right now, nor did I say he's better than Toney or Byrd.

              I said he's ONE OF the best out there, among 3 or 4 others who have been inactive and fighting meidocre composition.

              It's not very difficult to understand, unless you're just popping in and out of Vitali's ass to talk down about any other fighter that opposes your hero.

              Comment

              • Bozo_no no
                Palabras de Piedra
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2005
                • 8906
                • 416
                • 496
                • 16,069

                #67
                Originally posted by McKay 1
                There is no what if. It simple question as to the result of heavyweight unification bout. It is broken down the highest form of simplicity . It is 10/20=1/2 you want to turn what is such simplicity into negative decimal calculations to avoid a 1 vs 1 answer. And a question of relavance at that. The movites of your action? Well it clearly evidences the fact you are something other than a boxing purist.


                This proves your penchant for non sense.

                READ this garbage you just posted.


                Not only is it indicative of what a mess your head becomes when you're desperatly trying to maintain your agenda, it shows how ****** you are because TWICE I told you I think Brewster is capeable of beating Vitali or any Heavyweight.


                ENOUGH with your contrived garbage.

                The division has 4 unproven and inacitve title holders, with guys like Toney and Wlad looking in.

                There are several fights that will need to happen before someone establishes themselves as *THE* top Heavyweight with how segmented and divided things are.

                All the mixed up assumptions you got mean NOHTHING.

                It's wide open and up for grabs, and there are several fighters who can make them selves a candadate in their next fights.

                Comment

                • Bozo_no no
                  Palabras de Piedra
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Apr 2005
                  • 8906
                  • 416
                  • 496
                  • 16,069

                  #68
                  Originally posted by THE TRUTH
                  I am not saying that a win vs. Rahman makes Vitali, Ali or anything I just think it would prove he is #1 at heavy. But I am going to be honest, I think James Toney is the best fighter at heavyweight right now.

                  I don't see how it proves Vitali as the #1 Heavy when Rahman is about 5th right now at best.

                  Byrd, Toney, Brewster, and Ruiz are all surely deserving of higher recognition than Rahman.

                  Either way, I agree with you about JT. I think he's got the most skill out of them all, and he's not that dark of a horse if he gets the right opportunities and stays healthy.

                  Comment

                  • McKay 1
                    Entity
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Sep 2005
                    • 864
                    • 62
                    • 55
                    • 7,438

                    #69
                    Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
                    This proves your penchant for non sense.

                    READ this garbage you just posted.


                    Not only is it indicative of what a mess your head becomes when you're desperatly trying to maintain your agenda, it shows how ****** you are because TWICE I told you I think Brewster is capeable of beating Vitali or any Heavyweight.


                    ENOUGH with your contrived garbage.

                    The division has 4 unproven and inacitve title holders, with guys like Toney and Wlad looking in.

                    There are several fights that will need to happen before someone establishes themselves as *THE* top Heavyweight with how segmented and divided things are.

                    All the mixed up assumptions you got mean NOHTHING.

                    It's wide open and up for grabs, and there are several fighters who can make them selves a candadate in their next fights.
                    Is anybody here amused how you answer what is a simple yes or no question. Would Brewster beat Vitali? A relevant question. With your long off topic discertations. I certainly am not.

                    Comment

                    • Banderivets
                      'Ah Mr Haye'
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Dec 2004
                      • 3659
                      • 202
                      • 74
                      • 17,721

                      #70
                      Bozo, lets say Vitali fights all the top contenders and beats em all, will you give him the respect he desrves or will you continue you bull**** your way around saying how he is ****e?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP