Teh Better Achievement: Fighter of the Decade or Undefeated?

**Jack Napier** · 07-28-2011, 11:39 AM

Floyd not undefeated, he lost to Castillo

**Medved** · 07-28-2011, 11:40 AM

Depends who fought the better competition and how active everyone is.

There are a ton of undefeated fighters out there who are 30-0 40-0 but face bums. Having a "0" doesnt mean anything.

**Gino Ros** · 07-28-2011, 11:44 AM

Originally posted by MEAT

Which one is a better achievement thatll go down in history?

Without looking it up!!!

Who was Fighter of the Decade in the 60's?

Now, who retired 49-0?

**KING MEAT** · 07-28-2011, 11:44 AM

Originally posted by Jack Napier

Floyd not undefeated, he lost to Castillo

we can also say pac lost to JMM twice. but goin by official record here pare

**Gino Ros** · 07-28-2011, 11:45 AM

Fighter of the Decade isn't "an achievement". It isn't something that you "did". It was an award from journalists.

**Jack Napier** · 07-28-2011, 11:46 AM

Originally posted by MEAT

we can also say pac lost to JMM twice. but goin by official record here pare

still Pac
award is recognition like Dios said
it's about resume
Pac did more after getting iced twice than Floyd did "never losing"

**KING MEAT** · 07-28-2011, 11:47 AM

Originally posted by Gino Ros

Without looking it up!!!

Who was Fighter of the Decade in the 60's?

Now, who retired 49-0?

eh calzaghe? 49-0

and fotd - idk. im not a historian..

**TheKza** · 07-28-2011, 11:50 AM

Fighter of the decade. Being undefeated does not mean much unless you have had great performances against the best possible opposition available.
Usually you don't end up with an undefeated record anyway when you consistently fight the best.

**Brockton Lip** · 07-28-2011, 11:53 AM

Originally posted by MEAT

eh calzaghe? 49-0

and fotd - idk. im not a historian..

Rocky Marciano.

And there was no fighter of the decade in the 60's.

Teh Better Achievement: Fighter of the Decade or Undefeated?