Teh Better Achievement: Fighter of the Decade or Undefeated?
Collapse
-
-
Floyd has said a few times how manny pacquiao got fighter of the decade award when he has lost a few times. He seemed really bitter about it. But manny doesn't even care he has lost unlike mayweather because he knows he has a better resume overall.Comment
-
'Fighter of the decade' is simply an opinion.
One could aruge that Floyd Mayweather could be fighter of the decade. To some people, he is the fighter of the decade.
In the 60's, one could argue that;
Muhammad Ali
Emile Griffith
Carlos Ortiz
**** Tiger
And others
Could all be considered FOTD by one person or another.
I personally feel it's Emile Griffith, many agree with me.
At the same time, many think its Muhammad Ali.
I have heard alot of people say its Tiger or Ortiz, or someone else.
So yeah, it's just an opinion at the end of the day.Comment
-
Comment
-
i picked floyd's undefeated record just to be an ass, but honestly, manny's award is just an opinion. mayweather's record is a fact. and even with the controversial first castillo fight, manny actually lost to morales and had close fights with jmm, twice. so this isn't a matter of who has better names on their records, but "what's better": having an undefeated record or getting an award? i'd side with having the 0 in the loss column tbh.Comment
-
Floyd was ferious when Manny won that award. I mean on a scale of 1-10, his jealousy was at 9. I think Floyd would have traded his 0's for that award if he can LOL.Comment
-
Comment
Comment