Teh Better Achievement: Fighter of the Decade or Undefeated?
Collapse
-
-
Floyd has said a few times how manny pacquiao got fighter of the decade award when he has lost a few times. He seemed really bitter about it. But manny doesn't even care he has lost unlike mayweather because he knows he has a better resume overall.Comment
-
One could aruge that Floyd Mayweather could be fighter of the decade. To some people, he is the fighter of the decade.
In the 60's, one could argue that;
Muhammad Ali
Emile Griffith
Carlos Ortiz
**** Tiger
And others
Could all be considered FOTD by one person or another.
I personally feel it's Emile Griffith, many agree with me.
At the same time, many think its Muhammad Ali.
I have heard alot of people say its Tiger or Ortiz, or someone else.
So yeah, it's just an opinion at the end of the day.Comment
-
Comment
-
i picked floyd's undefeated record just to be an ass, but honestly, manny's award is just an opinion. mayweather's record is a fact. and even with the controversial first castillo fight, manny actually lost to morales and had close fights with jmm, twice. so this isn't a matter of who has better names on their records, but "what's better": having an undefeated record or getting an award? i'd side with having the 0 in the loss column tbh.Comment
-
Floyd was ferious when Manny won that award. I mean on a scale of 1-10, his jealousy was at 9. I think Floyd would have traded his 0's for that award if he can LOL.Comment
-
Comment
Comment