Ring Magazine advances Khan to No.1 in the division
Collapse
-
So because Tim didn't fight Amir he falls? So what if Tim fought Lucas next? Does Tim still get docked because he didn't fight Amir, despite fighting a guy ranked higher than Zab? The Rings logic is really ***ed up.Comment
-
-
Calm down bro. I have no problem with Khan being a ****** from England...I don't give a damn what he religion is or where's he's from. His a good fighter and that's all that matters. But, there are Nationalistic idiots like Check(not to single him out cuz' there are plenty more like him and worse on this forum) who only care where the fighter is from.
Comment
-
Khan deserves to be number one hes fought twice since bradley's last fight, and I dont expect bradley to be fighting until at least early 2012 which will make it a year out of the ring.
If your number you gotta fight, you cant expect to fight at that weight class only once a year. He beat Lamont back in Dec 2009 I think it was and since then he's only fought once at LWW. I mean come on you cant expect to stay number one in a division if you fight once a year in it.Comment
-
Yes there is a reason. In the last 24 months Khan has been putting in more work than Bradley at 147. So yes Khan deserves to be rank ahead of Bradley.Don't post something ignorant like that. There is no reason that Khan should of moved ahead of Bradley. The Zab victory wasn't that impressive. Khan performed well but we all seen that Zab is the same ole Zab so it certainly doesn't rank highly. The inactivity excuse was dumb by the ring. There is countless amount of fighters that go 6 months or longer and dont get moved down. Didn't the ring have Chris John in their top 10 despite not fighting for a very long period of time? The Ring is just acting out of emotion because Tim didn't fight Khan and that is wrong. It isn't their job to dictate fights.
But, again Khan is just a ****** from England...And, Bradley is American and that's the only thing that matters so therefor Bradley should be ranked ahead.Comment
-
I think Bradley has a slightly better resume,but Khan has a good one two..I would say 1.a and 1.b..Khan taking the top spot is cool,hey he is fighting and Bradley did opt not to fight him..But based on resume I have to go with Bradley with a slight lead..Oh and he is still more accomplished at the weight...Last edited by Rome-By-Ko; 07-25-2011, 06:31 PM.Comment
-
WHat kind of work are you talking about? Barerra, Salita?? Khan has two really nice wins, Kotelynik and Maidana but that's it, Zab was not a good win in my eyes. Bradley in the same time has taken care of Holt, Peterson, Alexander, Campbell, and now the Vasquez win looks more impressive too. How exactly is Khan putting in more?Yes there is a reason. In the last 24 months Khan has been putting in more work than Bradley at 147. So yes Khan deserves to be rank ahead of Bradley.
But, again Khan is just a ****** from England...And, Bradley is American and that's the only thing that matters so therefor Bradley should be ranked ahead.
You're debating like a ***** too by attacking me. It has nothing to do with where they are from. We are talking resumes so keep that **** out of it.Comment
Comment