Sky have dumped Boxing PPV until 2013!!!

[VERILY]

Get your facts right before you make ****** comments you can't even back up.

http://www.skysports.com/interactive...661172,00.html

Tyson was the kind of name here that neither Mayweather nor Pac will ever be - pairing him with Holyfield made those fights a whole other bag.


Look for another contest on that list that doesn't feature a British figher.


Floyd-Pacquiao wouldn't be PPV here unless it's attached to a sellable British card.


Now shush your mush, *****.

[Pooley]

If it turns out to be true, good on them.

[Pinoy4ever]

Good for the British ppl cause it has been nothing but disappointment when their own fighters has fought on pay per view.

[jijthejungleboy]

im willing to bet that if khan v mayweather happens in 2012 it will definitely be on sky box office PPV

[sunny31]

Tyson was the kind of name here that neither Mayweather nor Pac will ever be - pairing him with Holyfield made those fights a whole other bag.


Look for another contest on that list that doesn't feature a British figher.


Floyd-Pacquiao wouldn't be PPV here unless it's attached to a sellable British card.


Now shush your mush, *****.

Yes Tyson was the biggest ppv star ever, but pac-may will shatter any number he did on ppv, it will be sky box office with or without a british card. But they will probably cater a british card for the fight, ie arrange it around pac-may, but you bet your bottom dollar that none of the british card or any fighter or promoter involved with it would see any ppv revenue for the event. You will be proved wrong in time...rookie!

[VERILY]

Yes Tyson was the biggest ppv star ever, but pac-may will shatter any number he did on ppv, it will be sky box office with or without a british card. But they will probably cater a british card for the fight, ie arrange it around pac-may, but you bet your bottom dollar that none of the british card or any fighter or promoter involved with it would see any ppv revenue for the event. You will be proved wrong in time...rookie!

Pfffft, "rookie".


Overseas stars simply do not mean what they once did to a British public - and only a small few ever commanded that kind of household attention, anyway. If May-Pac is Box Office, it will not be without a sellable British card attached. You may be proved wrong in time, if Arum ever dares to let the ***el of his stable in a ring with Floyd...schmuck!

[Jedi Vader]

Tyson was the kind of name here that neither Mayweather nor Pac will ever be - pairing him with Holyfield made those fights a whole other bag.


Look for another contest on that list that doesn't feature a British figher.


Floyd-Pacquiao wouldn't be PPV here unless it's attached to a sellable British card.


Now shush your mush, *****.

Uh????

Why should I shut up??

I said something, someone refuted it without checking their facts, I clearly proved them wrong WITH facts, end of that particular debate.

It's irrelevant whether Tyson is a bigger draw or not. What is relevant is that Sky WILL put on a pay-per-view even though neither combatants are English.

Now rotate on my middle finger. Twat.

[VERILY]

What is relevant is that Sky WILL put on a pay-per-view even though neither combatants are English.

NOT in these times they WON'T, NOT with these combatants.

Things are no longer what they were.

Uh????

Why should I shut up??

Because you're just another run-of-the-mill Brit-parasite schmucko poster with a cheap and cheesy reference in his screenname who knows sweet Fanny Adams about anything.


Whereas I am Adam Konitz, ie. GREATNESS INCARNATE, so I get to tell you what to do. Suck it up, pussy-boy.

[Jedi Vader]

The usual retort from a juvenile who cannot reason properly.

[Medved]

lol @ UK fans thinking SKY will make a PPV at 3am in the morning. Froch-Ward will be on SKY not Boxoffice.

2am-3am PPV's must do like 10-20k sales.