Orlando Salido testing POSITIVE for Banned Substance

[uoykcuf]

OK So I open this thread because I recently saw Robert Guerrero's video claiming he fought a "juiced up" fighter. And everyone seems to forget that Salido had a follow up and tested NEGATIVE for any substance he was accused off.

So In conclusion,, I believe it's all a lie. I believe Guerrero and his team want to believe Salido was on roids for their peace of mind.. He said he hit Salido with everything and he just kept on coming.. WAKE UP, there will always be someone stronger than you...


On November 4, 2006, he defeated Robert Guerrero for the IBF world title, by a unanimous decision. The Official scorers saw it 115-113, 118-110, 117-111. Salido's win over Guerrero was marred by controversy, as Salido reportedly tested positive for steroids after the fight.[2]
As a result of his positive test for Nandrolone, Salido was stripped of his title and faced disciplinary action in Nevada, which included a suspension.[3] Salido maintained his innocence and immediately had a follow up test at LabCorp, a nationally recognized blood lab. The findings were negative of any steroids. It should be noted that Nandrolone is an anabolic steroid that may be present naturally in the human body in minute quan******



Did the IBF give him his status of champion and belt back? NO.. Conspiracy much to keep Guerrero as champion.

Robert Guerrero is a *****, and he'll be Maidana's puta soon enough just like he was Salidos. Only Putas make excuses for losing. Especially since Guerrero knows what they found in Salido's system can naturally be made. That p##sy even ducked a rematch.

[IMDAZED]

Andro is not coke that you can piss out. It stays in your system for a while, plus the athletes in many cases are tested for the breakdown elements rather then the actual substance. These can stay in the system for a very long time.

Andro as in androstendione? Anyway, while the breakdown elements are usually tested for...if you didn't use, what's to break down?

[theplayerpimp]

Really? thanks for informing me that Salido is the guy everyone is talking about and the center of controversy because of something that happened 5 years ago and its still relevant news today.

When people keep bringing it up its still relevant but you like 75 percent of the ******s here want to talk about pac floyd and roids.

[vacon04]

Andro as in androstendione? Anyway, while the breakdown elements are usually tested for...if you didn't use, what's to break down?

Nandrolone has a detection time of 1 year+, sometimes it can be detected even a year and a half after using it. Now, as BrooklynBomber said, laboratories do not actually test for the substance itself, but they rather test for the breakdown products.

[Larry the boss]

so the commision test failed him??and better testing passed him??

[americanbot]

Everyone has a different reason why they test positive. If you want to believe he tested over three times the limit because of a steak dinner he had then by all means, believe it.

now you're just TROLLING KIDO.

you know I've said nothing of the sort.

Nandrolone CAN lead to a positive test by eating too much meat (especially american meat) before the fight. thats a FACT. Nandrolone being in every human beings body naturally is also a fact. **** if your nandrolone levels are too high because of EXERCISE & high intense punching. that can lead to a positive urine test (without even doing anything) THATS A FACT. READ

"But a combination of both dietary supplements (none of which contain a banned substance) and exercise, can result in a positive nandrolone test. The reason for this is still unclear, but one theory is that there is a link between heavy training, the dehydration that goes with it, and their effects upon the components of high protein diets. Until more work is done, however, the 'nandrolone mystery' goes on..."

what more owning do you need bro....

[IMDAZED]

Nandrolone has a detection time of 1 year+, sometimes it can be detected even a year and a half after using it. Now, as BrooklynBomber said, laboratories do not actually test for the substance itself, but they rather test for the breakdown products.

I know they test the breakdown product. How does this contradict anything?

[Spray_resistant]

When people keep bringing it up its still relevant but you like 75 percent of the ******s here want to talk about pac floyd and roids.

When was I talking about Pac/Floyd garbage? I actually made a group some time ago for ppl who don't want to talk about it so you clearly are just making things up to defend some obscure fighter who was a thread needlessly made about. He is doing fine it hasn't seemed to hurt his career and no one will care when Salido retires.

[vacon04]

I know they test the breakdown product. How does this contradict anything?

Immediately had a follow-up test means...immediately after he found out the first one was positive. Which means...well after the fact. Of course he was going to test negative the second time.

Contradict? I'm only explaining how does this drug testing works. Now you said that of course he was going to test negative the second time, but unless the second time he took the test was more than a year later after the fight he was going to test positive again if he was on nandrolone.

[IMDAZED]

now you're just TROLLING KIDO.

you know I've said nothing of the sort.

Nandrolone CAN lead to a positive by eating too much meat (especially american meat) before the fight. thats a FACT. Nandrolone being in every human beings body naturally is also a fact. READ


"But a combination of both dietary supplements (none of which contain a banned substance) and exercise, can result in a positive nandrolone test. The reason for this is still unclear, but one theory is that there is a link between heavy training, the dehydration that goes with it, and their effects upon the components of high protein diets. Until more work is done, however, the 'nandrolone mystery' goes on..."

what more owning do you need bro....

I don't know, do you have any other theories to throw out? BTW, you go that from the article I linked, no? The one that says nandrolone is popular among athletes? Or did you forget that's what you were arguing against? You own yourself quite nicely.