lara thinks he's important now. but i'm glad they knocked the 3 judge out.that was cheating red handed.but lara don't think that you're elite because you got robbed against an shot,and easy to be hit paul williams.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Erislandy Lara Open Letter To Fans, Media and HBO
Collapse
-
Originally posted by flint View Postlara thinks he's important now. but i'm glad they knocked the 3 judge out.that was cheating red handed.but lara don't think that you're elite because you got robbed against an shot,and easy to be hit paul williams.
Comment
-
I know what I'm going to say is unpoular but I scored the fight 115 - 113 Lara and I'm not a Williams fan. So if one or two round are judged a different way, there is NO MAJOR ROBERY. Yes, I thought Lara won but Williams was not given credit for the punches landed to the body and the mountain of work he done in between the big shot. If Lara landed on average 5 big lefts a round lets say those shots won him 30 seconds what happened the other 2:30 seconds? Some judges don't favor counter-punchers because if there are two counter-punchers in a fight we get boring fights.... Of course Lara landed the cleaner shots because its easier to counter-punch than to punch a defensive target. But the key word is cleaner which doesn't mean that Williams shots weren't clean it's just that Lara shots were cleaner. Williams threw twice as many punches and they both basically landed the same amount of punches so why is it a major robery when the guy that did more work, threw the most punches got the close decision? This is what happens to counter-punchers from time to time but if they don't like it, they can always be more exciting and go for the KO and take it out of the judges hands but if they did that, they wouldn't be counter-punchers. Basically I've seen a lot bigger and worse roberies in boxing, and I can't cry foul when both guys stayed on their feet the whole fight and they landed the same amount of punches and the guy that got the decision threw twice as many punches as his opponent.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jjbj2 View PostDidn't they fight already Lara vs Molina and it was a Draw? I have no problem with the fight. He belongs in either a main event type of fight on ESPN, HBO, and Showtime. He also belong in an undercard of a big fight too.
Lara showed skill and determination not to be bullied by the bigger man inside the ring. He should definitely be back twice more.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stl_Buay View PostI know what I'm going to say is unpoular but I scored the fight 115 - 113 Lara and I'm not a Williams fan. So if one or two round are judged a different way, there is NO MAJOR ROBERY. Yes, I thought Lara won but Williams was not given credit for the punches landed to the body and the mountain of work he done in between the big shot. If Lara landed on average 5 big lefts a round lets say those shots won him 30 seconds what happened the other 2:30 seconds? Some judges don't favor counter-punchers because if there are two counter-punchers in a fight we get boring fights.... Of course Lara landed the cleaner shots because its easier to counter-punch than to punch a defensive target. But the key word is cleaner which doesn't mean that Williams shots weren't clean it's just that Lara shots were cleaner. Williams threw twice as many punches and they both basically landed the same amount of punches so why is it a major robery when the guy that did more work, threw the most punches got the close decision? This is what happens to counter-punchers from time to time but if they don't like it, they can always be more exciting and go for the KO and take it out of the judges hands but if they did that, they wouldn't be counter-punchers. Basically I've seen a lot bigger and worse roberies in boxing, and I can't cry foul when both guys stayed on their feet the whole fight and they landed the same amount of punches and the guy that got the decision threw twice as many punches as his opponent.
unlike wolak's pressure and work rate, where a lot of his shots were CLEAN, head snapping shots. Williams literally landed basically ALL "pity patty" shots. for every 10 pitty pat punch williams THREW, he landed one. . . while lara landed a clean, wig splitting shot to that one pitty patty shotLast edited by UglyPug; 07-16-2011, 12:20 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stl_Buay View PostI know what I'm going to say is unpoular but I scored the fight 115 - 113 Lara and I'm not a Williams fan. So if one or two round are judged a different way, there is NO MAJOR ROBERY. Yes, I thought Lara won but Williams was not given credit for the punches landed to the body and the mountain of work he done in between the big shot. If Lara landed on average 5 big lefts a round lets say those shots won him 30 seconds what happened the other 2:30 seconds? Some judges don't favor counter-punchers because if there are two counter-punchers in a fight we get boring fights.... Of course Lara landed the cleaner shots because its easier to counter-punch than to punch a defensive target. But the key word is cleaner which doesn't mean that Williams shots weren't clean it's just that Lara shots were cleaner. Williams threw twice as many punches and they both basically landed the same amount of punches so why is it a major robery when the guy that did more work, threw the most punches got the close decision? This is what happens to counter-punchers from time to time but if they don't like it, they can always be more exciting and go for the KO and take it out of the judges hands but if they did that, they wouldn't be counter-punchers. Basically I've seen a lot bigger and worse roberies in boxing, and I can't cry foul when both guys stayed on their feet the whole fight and they landed the same amount of punches and the guy that got the decision threw twice as many punches as his opponent.
Comment
-
Originally posted by garfios View PostSo you scored the fight for Lara even though you think that you have to get credit for throwing more than your opponent even if you land much less, of course for you is not going to b a robbery.
Comment
Comment