Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official Jin Mosley-Iceman John Scully round-by-round discussion thread...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jin mosley is a ******, her eyes reveals it.

    But so is the american law. Why on earth does a marriage and a divorce = the right to the x´s wealth.?

    women are not in any way hindered in working, are they.? Was she not paid as his manager.? Does a divorce = inability to work for life.?

    How about working for your own money... but noooo.. much easier to portray the tough business women,, burn the brahs and demand equality. Yet they still endear, playing the role of the victim and they get away with it. Not only do they, in general, get away with it, they are rewarded for it and in this case financially rewarded. Hypocritical behaviour.

    Those laws and that way of thinking, must be ancient. It certainly doesnt come of as modern or reasoned.

    sure he should pay HALf of expences for the kids, nothing more and nothing less.
    Last edited by gigogreco; 07-15-2011, 03:28 PM.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Cash Cow View Post
      i get what you are saying....but wheres all the advocacy for the houses, furniture, cars...etc etc that were purchased with his boxing money...is he entitled to everything just cause he got in the ring and boxed?

      man have you ever lived in California?
      I haven't lived in California, and I understand that apparently laws dictate that this is well.. Legal. However I think the reason those items purchased with money he earned are different in that they are not directly related and a reflection of his work in the sport of boxing. They also are more likely to hold sentimental value for him than say a flat screen TV that the two of them once shared. If it wasn't a bit strange or offputting for her to get his belts, it wouldn't be such a polarizing headline that has everyone is reacting to. I actually read about it in a couple non boxing non sport media outlets.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by gigogreco View Post
        jin mosley is a ******, her eyes reveals it.

        But so is the american law. Why on earth does a marriage and a divorce = the right to the x´s wealth.?

        women are not in any way hindered in working, are they.? Was she not paid as his manager.? Does a divorce = inability to work for life.?

        They act tough, burn their brahs and demand equality, but still endear, playing the role of the victim and they get away with it. Not only do they, in general, get away with it, they are rewarded for it and in this case financially rewarded. Hypocritical behaviour.

        Those laws and that way of thinking, must be ancient. It certainly doesnt come of as modern or reasoned.

        sure he should pay HALf of expences for the kids, nothing more and nothing less.
        actually they are modern. nothing ancient about them. so yea, its the opposite.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by ElderlyBeater View Post
          Yes, by the law we know how it works, but just because the judges say you get to keep half of everything, it doesn't mean that it is right.

          If she actually had any decency, she would have given the belts to him regardless.

          No one has to like it.
          I think also a large part of the stir is her explaining it away as "for the kids."

          Comment


          • Originally posted by gigogreco View Post
            jin mosley is a ******, her eyes reveals it.

            But so is the american law. Why on earth does a marriage and a divorce = the right to the x´s wealth.?

            women are not in any way hindered in working, are they.? Was she not paid as his manager.? Does a divorce = inability to work for life.?

            They act tough, burn their brahs and demand equality, but still endear, playing the role of the victim and they get away with it. Not only do they, in general, get away with it, they are rewarded for it and in this case financially rewarded. Hypocritical behaviour.

            Those laws and that way of thinking, must be ancient. It certainly doesnt come of as modern or reasoned.

            sure he should pay HALf of expences for the kids, nothing more and nothing less.
            dude..she wasnt just his wife...she was the brains&business behind his boxing career.....u act like she sat home all day on her fat ass and watched soap operas...

            everyone who is anyone in boxing will say this was a business women who was on her **** and didnt take any **** in a male dominated sport.....


            Comment


            • Originally posted by ElderlyBeater View Post
              Yes, by the law we know how it works, but just because the judges say you get to keep half of everything, it doesn't mean that it is right.

              If she actually had any decency, she would have given the belts to him regardless.

              No one has to like it.

              that would be like Jin saying..."if you had the decency you would have told me you didnt want to be married insteandof deceiving me and your kids for years while you were dippin in other pu$$y and got caught up"

              she dont owe Shane ****.....i understand both sides of the situation and this is def a payback situation for his marriage behavior...cant blame her...

              a womans scorn us a beyyyotch....

              maybe she shoulda made shane just do this...

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Cash Cow View Post
                actually im not....its just funny reading all these posts about how cruel she is for taking belts from Shane..when you nor I know if this is something Shane himself agreed upon within the divorce court proceedings......

                do you know of this was agreed on by Shane and his council or not?.

                i'll wait Einstein..
                Do you think Shane wants to give her 6K a month for clothes? Hell no is my guess.

                However he has to because that is how she lived before.

                We may have not heard on what he said, but that is notthe point, not for me.

                I am judging her, yes I am on the way things have happened now.

                If you want to cry about my opinion then no problem.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by DE100 View Post
                  or I dont get super emotional about others relationships I know nothing about.


                  you didn't know that she already took half of his money and keeping the belts out of spite?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by ElderlyBeater View Post
                    Do you think Shane wants to give her 6K a month for clothes? Hell no is my guess.

                    However he has to because that is how she lived before.

                    We may have not heard on what he said, but that is notthe point, not for me.

                    I am judging her, yes I am on the way things have happened now.

                    If you want to cry about my opinion then no problem.
                    honestly id let the b!tch keep the belts to lower that 6K per month...ouch!!

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI- View Post
                      you didn't know that she already took half of his money and keeping the belts out of spite?
                      Jin dont want Bella posing naked and getting smashed out while wearing the belts....because thats what Shane did to her

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP