Bernard Hopkins should have won the espy for Best Fighter because he took on and beat a young lion convincingly in Jean Pascal and Manny Pacquiao fought and beat two washed up opponents in Antonio Margarito and Sugar Shane Mosley.
Hopkins should have won the espy no Pacquiao.
Collapse
-
-
I would of given it to Sergio. I don't think Pac deserved it compared to him. Hell I dislike Hopkins but in my opinion he has more of a claim to it than Pac.Comment
-
Your a boxing fan so you know who Bhop and Sergio are. You think the ESPY voters (fans) know anything more than mayweather and Pac?
You know Carl Froch had a good year too.Comment
-
Exactly.Remember when B-Hop won the title at 46 boxing is weak.Bit Pacman beat Margarito & he was greater than Duran.Espn for U.Comment
-
The category is BEST fighter. Not best opposition. *****s still think floyd should have won fotd based on skill instead of resume so why y'all cryin about this.Comment
-
I remember arguing with a delusional ***** on here who believed millions and millions of people around the world believed Manny is to blame and that his legacy, not floyd's was going to be scrutinized by the public.........LMAO, chalk this up as another reality check, Isn't ESPY winner voted by the fans??? Floyd get's booed and Manny wins the ESPY, whos legacy will be scrutinized???.. Take the test Floyd!!!!Comment
Comment