Floyd - Manny Negotiations Timeline Part 2

[Cash Cow]

so manny never agreed to no cut off date?

NOPE...

[Cash Cow]

Pacquiao: "J dubb, we'll see you in court"

[Cash Cow]

we all know floydhype.com is biased towards which fighter.

well how about you FIND the articles that they failed to post? Find the articles that dispute the articles presented....until then..

[tomhawq]

i can't see why floydiots keep bumping this thread. these timeline nonsense just give credence to floyd's pu55iness. i really don't see the point. if you want to fight someone you just fight. you even give up something. hagler put it the best, "you even go to his house and fight in his living room." that's what normal fans expect. not things like move the goal post when the opponent agrees to the initial demands.

i for one don't need to read these ****** timelines. what sticks out the most in my mind was when arum was looking for a venue. he found the dallas cowboys. team mayweather didn't even bother to look into it. go figure who was making the fight difficult to happen.

besides, mainstream media have already spoken: floyd is holding up this fight. no amount of explanation can change things around.

[Cash Cow]

i can't see why floydiots keep bumping this thread. these timeline nonsense just give credence to floyd's pu55iness. i really don't see the point. if you want to fight someone you just fight. you even give up something. hagler put it the best, "you even go to his house and fight in his living room." that's what normal fans expect. not things like move the goal post when the opponent agrees to the initial demands.

i for one don't need to read these ****** timelines. what sticks out the most in my mind was when arum was looking for a venue. he found the dallas cowboys. team mayweather didn't even bother to look into it. go figure who is making the fight difficult to happen.

besides, mainstream media have already spoken: floyd is holding up this fight. no amount of explanation can change things around.

so you are saying this FACTUAL Timeline is pointless?

[Spacey1991]

I want 2:1 odds that this threads gets deleted by July 5th 2011 at 11:30PM PST 2:30AM EST.

Up to 20mill.

Any takers?

Ill take it. PM me.

[littlemac]

i can't see why floydiots keep bumping this thread. these timeline nonsense just give credence to floyd's pu55iness. i really don't see the point. if you want to fight someone you just fight. you even give up something. hagler put it the best, "you even go to his house and fight in his living room." that's what normal fans expect. not things like move the goal post when the opponent agrees to the initial demands.

i for one don't need to read these ****** timelines. what sticks out the most in my mind was when arum was looking for a venue. he found the dallas cowboys. team mayweather didn't even bother to look into it. go figure who was making the fight difficult to happen.

besides, mainstream media have already spoken: floyd is holding up this fight. no amount of explanation can change things around.

Just one question. Do you accept the "timeline part1&2" report as facts? A simple yes or no answer is sufficient.

[tomhawq]

Just one question. Do you accept the "timeline part1&2" report as facts? A simple yes or no answer is sufficient.

like i've mentioned i have no interest in reading these silly stuff. they're for people who have no life. if you're a normal boxing fan all your interest is focused on making the fight happen.

i have lost interest in this fight, bro. most people have. if all you floyd fans' interest is making pac look bad on paper, so be it. i don't think a lot of people would be interested in silly things like that. fight is what they want. not drama.

[CasualBoxingFan]

like i've mentioned i have no interest in reading these silly stuff. they're for people who have no life. if you're a normal boxing fan all your interest is focused on making the fight happen.

i have lost interest in this fight, bro. most people have. if all you floyd fans' interest is making pac look bad on paper, so be it. i don't think a lot of people would be interested in silly things like that. fight is what they want. not drama.

LMAO

Stealthards and Flamos at their finest.

Your promoting the same thing on the 2nd youtube video on your sig.

I enjoy owning Flamos, but sometimes *******s are too easy.lol



LOL!!!!!

[pinoy Killa]

like i've mentioned i have no interest in reading these silly stuff. they're for people who have no life. if you're a normal boxing fan all your interest is focused on making the fight happen.

i have lost interest in this fight, bro. most people have. if all you floyd fans' interest is making pac look bad on paper, so be it. i don't think a lot of people would be interested in silly things like that. fight is what they want. not drama.

So in Other words they give you both sides of the story Unbiased as can be literally. And you still dont want to look at facts versus propoganda Damn, OK if that is how you feel thats cool also.

But You missing alot of truth in the articles brother, just saying