Sturm vs Macklin. RBR and discussion

[catalinul]

No robbery.

Just that the 8-4 cards were a bit wide for such a close fight.

[BattlingNelson]

116-112 seems a bit wide. A split decision is appropriate in this great and close fight.

Mac deserves a rematch.

I cannot understand why Sturm allowed the fight to be a phonebooth battle though.

[chike99]

What fight were those two judges watching?

[Joe2608]

I had it a draw in the end, and it could have gone either way to each fighter by a round but those scorecards are just way too wide.

[leppard365]

no way that was 8-4 sturm. i gave macklin 5 rounds out of the opening 7. robbed.

[Medved]

Yeah, arm punches had Sturm's body looking like Rocky's hand after the meat fridge.

What did you have ALexander-Kotelnik? 120-104? Deducted points from Kotelnik for avoiding 1000 air punches?

Sturm deserved the win, I wouldve been fine with a draw TBH. I had it 116-113 exactly like the 2 judges AND I HATE STURM SINCE HE HIDES.

[-Kev-]

Can't give my opinion on the scorecards since I started watching the fight in the 6th round. But I saw a back and forth fight from the 6th-12th and if the majority of had it 5-2 for Macklin at the end of the 7th, then Macklin should have won something like 8-4.

[starjammer]

I had a draw.

[The Monk]

Hey, look at me, I know how to score a fight, even tho I hate Sturm with a passion!

Some of you guys need glasses and learn how to judge a fight. Air Punches and Wild combos that do NO DMG = not a win.

Are the other 18 and a half thousand posts as **** as this one?

[Ray*]

8-4 rounds for sturm? Nah...lol