Personally, I think the lightweight version of Mosley beats Mayweather and Pac. But, both are historically better. I think sometime people blur the line between a fighter's physical prime and whether they're still fighting at a high level and scew it to fit their arguements. Take Roy Jones. A diehard RJ fan won't give Tarver credit for beating RJ because he was no longer in his physical prime, which is true. But, he was still considered the best fighter in the world when Tarver starched him. So to not give Tarver credit is ridiculous, IMO. The same will happen when and if Mayweather and Pac fight. I've been watching both for 15 years and I'll tell anyone that ask Mayweather isn't nearly as good as he was as a lightweight and Pac isn't as good as he was at 130, which IMO were both fighters physical primes. I think most would agree. So if Mayweather wins, the *******s will scream that Money waited out and fought an "old" Pacquaio. If Pac wins, the *****s will scream that Pac beat an old, inactive fighter. In the end, it will all be nonsense because both are still fighting at a ridiculously high levels, even thouigh their physical primes are long gone.
GOOD POINT! its hardly to find an intellectual post like this where PBF and PAC's name were involved. Hats to you my friend( can I? )
Tweet
)
Comment