Tweet
There is a pending defamation suit filed by Pacman against the Mayweathers, so I think let the Court decides on this issue!
-
-
For the same reason Team Pacquiao has been cold-busted trying to lie about and twist facts about the negotiations:
Mediator Releases Corrective Statement on Mayweather-Pacquiao Negotiations
by Press Releases on Jan.08, 2010, under Boxing News
Judge Daniel Weinstein today issued an order to correct the false record that has been created by the recent statements from Top Rank and Manny Pacquiao’s representatives concerning what occurred at the mediation.
The full text of the Judge’s statement is as follows:
Mediator’s Corrective Order Re: Mayweather-Pacquiao Mediation
The Mediator finds:
1. Various articles have appeared in the press purporting to characterize the substance and outcome of the Mayweather-Pacquiao mediation and the negotiations between the parties. Many of the reports are incorrect.
2. The mediation was a confidential proceeding. Any comments to the press or public by participants in the mediation purporting to report the substance or details of the mediation are violations of the strict confidentiality to which the parties and their representatives agreed and which they authorized the Mediator to enforce.
3. The parties and their representatives authorized that, if misinformation was disclosed to the press by either side, the Mediator would correct any erroneous information.
The Mediator corrects the erroneous reports to the press as follows:
a. Both parties participated in the mediation in good faith. Both parties participated in many hours of negotiation, with a number of proposals issued by each side and carefully considered by the parties and their representatives.
b. The Mediator himself did not formulate, recommend or issue a Mediator’s Proposal. The Mediator did not make an evaluation or finding that any one of the many proposals considered by the parties was the correct protocol.
c. Any attempt to characterize the mediation process as an acceptance or rejection by any of the parties of a mediator’s or an arbiter’s proposal or of any specific proposal is false.
d. In the end, the parties could not agree on a testing protocol acceptable to all.
Any more questions?Comment
-
What's with people nowadays creating threads that they already know what the answer to their question is.
And not hating here Larry and pardon me for this, but please fix your spelling and grammar. No disrespect, you create threads that are misleading sometimes.
Do you mean with excepting = accepting?Comment
-
pac's camp comes out with conflicting statements regarding the testing, most of them aren't even official statements.
but what's consistent is pacquiao willing to go under testing far stricter than what he or any other boxer has to go through.Comment
-
If Floyd really cared about testin, and wasnt just tring to put off the fight and wait for Pac to get beat up more in wars wit other fighters (Maragarito, Marquez, etc.) then he would've went to the commission to request additional testing. Not once did he ever do this. Instead, he tries to play mind games by demanding testing above and beyond what's required.
I understand that some people say, "if your clean, just take the test"
The reason to not is simple - A lot of this sport is mental, and Team Pac does not want to bow down and agree to Floyd's demand for the testing which is above and abeyond anythin done for a chamionship fight. This wasn't negotiations regarding weight or gloves or anythin else which is normal for a fight, this was a demand which was never done before.
So if it wasnt just a way to delay the fight or get in floyds head, and he really cared about stricter testing, why wuoldnt he go to the commission and request it - especially considerin the commission themselves says they accept those types of requests and review them on a case by case determinationComment
Comment