Comments Thread For: Amir Khan Talks Sky Rift, Bradley Being Scared, More

[rich6666]

no1 is saying sky is gonna be the loser, how can they when they make so much money? what im saying is i can see the sky cards getting real **** with not much big american cards on, oscar already said he is gonna do more buisness with primetime, why not move some of the big american mayweather cards to primetime and get ppv money instead of a one off payment from sky, thats what i would do, would show sky who calls the shots and could probably stand to make more money, all be it to a smaller audiance,,

You are too silly to respond to. I bet all of my points Mayweathers next fight will be shown on SKY platform. Goldenboy are pissing in the wind if they feel they can dictate anything to SKY.

I honestly feel no more than 10,000 UK fans would pay for a none British participate in the main event PPV, and 10,000 is a top end figure.

[Rick Grimes]

no1 is saying sky is gonna be the loser, how can they when they make so much money? what im saying is i can see the sky cards getting real **** with not much big american cards on, oscar already said he is gonna do more buisness with primetime, why not move some of the big american mayweather cards to primetime and get ppv money instead of a one off payment from sky, thats what i would do, would show sky who calls the shots and could probably stand to make more money, all be it to a smaller audiance,,

SKY doen't really care about boxing they only pick the American fights up because they are cheap, the only money they make from boxing is big British PPV fighters. Do you think anyone is going to buy American cards at 4am when no British fighter is fighting? Khan PPV's sell less than 100k and he's an household name.

[bboy80]

I don't see the problem if its on Sky ppv or Primetime, lets face it hardly anyone is going to pay for it anyway.

If you have any sense you will watch for free on Veetle.

[BetterCallSaul]

I don't see the problem if its on Sky ppv or Primetime, lets face it hardly anyone is going to pay for it anyway.

If you have any sense you will watch for free on Veetle.

Khan vs McCloskey did 70,000 on Primetime. That figure would have at least trebled if Sky kept it on PPV. Khan vs Judah will do at least 150,000 on Primetime.

But yeah, I will be watching it on Veetle. Primetime coverage sucks and I refuse to pay for it.

[rich6666]

Khan vs McCloskey did 70,000 on Primetime. That figure would have at least trebled if Sky kept it on PPV. Khan vs Judah will do at least 150,000 on Primetime.

But yeah, I will be watching it on Veetle. Primetime coverage sucks and I refuse to pay for it.

What makes you think Khan vs Judah will do more than the McCloskey fight?

[Dave Rado]

What makes you think Khan vs Judah will do more than the McCloskey fight?

Far more notice in which to promote it plus a far more credible opponent, who has a big punch and a genuine chance of winning.

[pcpc]

According to team Khan sky refused khans next two fights even though they offered them on normal sky, not ppv!!! sounds More personal then buisness on sky's part

[-JUGGERNAUT-]

According to team Khan sky refused khans next two fights even though they offered them on normal sky, not ppv!!! sounds More personal then buisness on sky's part

What are you trying to say, huh?

Spit it out sunshine.

[pcpc]

what im trying to say is sky are a bunch of greedy bastards who are trying to scam the general public, why what do you want me to say?

[-JUGGERNAUT-]

what im trying to say is sky are a bunch of greedy bastards who are trying to scam the general public, why what do you want me to say?

Let 'er rip lad. What's really on your mind.