Comments Thread For: Roach: No Robbery, Pacquiao Beat Marquez Twice

[PRINCE O' PROSE]

so Freddy is saying the Man that has made him a Millionaire won a couple fights even some of his own country men thought he lost? LOL

of course hes going to say that ,the same way Nacho would say JMM won both fights...

I personally believe he at least won the second


inb4 60 pages , *******s , JMM getting called a crybaby,piss drinker and someone bringing up the judges score card in the first fight .

Yeah.


I had Pac winning the first fight, by dint of scraping just enough rounds together to put it out of Juan's reach after the 10-6 opener.


The rematch was JMM, though. Competetive, but clear.

[Las Vegas,]

First fight was a draw. Don't come at me with the "The first round should of been 10-6!" because the 7th round was clearly a 10-9 no where near a 10-8 for Pacquiao like one of the judges had it.

2nd fight was Marquez. Easily. Outboxed him for more rounds.

3rd fight will be clearly for Marquez.

[Twako]

1st fight should've been pac's.

2nd fight was even on the rounds clearly. the KD won it for pac.

[PRINCE O' PROSE]

First fight was a draw. Don't come at me with the "The first round should of been 10-6!" because the 7th round was clearly a 10-9 no where near a 10-8 for Pacquiao like one of the judges had it.

2nd fight was Marquez. Easily. Outboxed him for more rounds.

3rd fight will be clearly for Marquez.

I didn't score a 10-8 round, but I still score their first fight for Pac...just.

1st fight should've been pac's.

2nd fight was even on the rounds clearly. the KD won it for pac.

The official scoring on fight #2 was a crock of old ****.

JMM won that fight. And most people with a clue know it.



I agree Pac won the first, though.

[LeadUppercut]

even Manny Pacquiao thought he lost the 2nd fight he was congratulating JMM corner and all of a sudden he heard "and still" then went all crazy

I am telling you, a lot of these *******s have not even seen that fight imho.

Pacquiao looked like a beaten man, I thought he was gonna cry, Marquez on the other hand looked like a man who had just pulled off a good win.

Always a tell-tale sign, as if you actually needed one for that fight.

[LeadUppercut]

I didn't score a 10-8 round, but I still score their first fight for Pac...just.

The official scoring on fight #2 was a crock of old ****.

JMM won that fight. And most people with a clue know it.

I agree Pac won the first, though.

I disagree, the second fight was closer than the first.

Are you maybe scoring like the *******s do ?

10 points for a KD, because it is half a KO

[LeG00N]

First fight was a draw. Don't come at me with the "The first round should of been 10-6!" because the 7th round was clearly a 10-9 no where near a 10-8 for Pacquiao like one of the judges had it.

2nd fight was Marquez. Easily. Outboxed him for more rounds.

3rd fight will be clearly for Marquez.

not to mention Pacquiao hit him while he was down ... which in some cases can get an instant DQ

I'm okay with them not calling Pacquiao on it though It didn't seem like he did it on purpose

[A. Elizarraraz]

Another washed up, old boxer at the end of his career for Pacquiao. What a joke! Every single fighter has ever defeated has been either coming off wars, coming back from losses and or are pretty much done with their boxing careers. I mean, I understand Arum being a business man is not going to put his cash cow at risk, but come on!....waiting 3.5 years to face an old Marquez, and on top of that at welterweight?!!!! Haha. Ridiculous and shameful. After the second fight with Marquez I posted a comment on HBO.com where I said that Pacquiao would never face him again, but if I was wrong he would do it when Marquez was an old guy...I was right. Do you people realize that Arum would've never faced Pacquiao against DLH, had DLH been in his prime or even a few years younger!?....if you don't see that, then you must be a typical Pacquiao fanatic. When Pacquiao faced Cotto, he had just been given a brutal beating, the type of beating that not only damages a fighter physically, but psychologically, and you are never the same again. Look at Meldrick Taylor when he faced J.C. Chavez. Taylor's career was over at the age of 23 when he was together with Chavez, the best two pound for pound in the sport. Same thing goes for Margarito, he was destroyed by Mosley prior to his fight with Pacquiao. Mosley, a 39 year old guy hahaha, sorry, I know this is serious. Mosley was beat up and given a boxing lesson by Mayweather and then he faced Pacquiao. The great fighters have always faced great opponents at the opponents prime....Pacquiao has never done that and has faced great names but not great fighters. Any other promoter would do what Bob Arum is doing and faced Pacquiao against such opponents, and keep making the more money. I've been following boxing since I was a little kid sun Chavez defeated Maywether in the mid 80's, when boxing was a real sport. Today's fighters wouldn't be able to compete against guys like Chavez, Sanchez, Whitaker, Taylor etc. Boxing is nothing more than a great business for promoters and TV networks. What a shame.

[tangalog2200]

marquez will let us all know if pac's been juicing or not.... cos if he can't stand up to pacquiao's power at ww then i think we'll all have some questioning to do....

yesterday's conditions do not necessarily still holds true for today.....

the wear and tear of previous fights sometimes catch up with you.....

if jmm is to be stopped in the 3rd fight...implying questions must be raised on pac; as if pac had never stopped an opponent b4 is again to cast a shadow over pac's win....

another "ost is a must" position???

[Roja's480]

gotta admit guys even though i like watching Marquez i completely forgot about this fight, but ya what did roach say really