Should the Greatest Boxer EVER Be Able to beat a BUM on roids?

[etlux]

Nope.

A blessed talented athlete who works hard his/her entire life will not even come close to a person who has taken steroids for a month.

That is the kind of performance increases steroids provide. That above sentence isn't even mine, E:60 had a story on steroids and a man interviewed for E:60 said that.

LMAO! you're kidding right? That means every bum and unskilled worthless turd off the street would be dominating every single sport in the EARTH without any training. Why are hard working athletes still at the top of every sport? What a joke of a statement

[MindBat]

even if there was no test and floyd ALLOWED Pac openly to take steroids for the match, since Pac is considered a completely unskilled BUM by the Mayweathers, shouldn't the self proclaimed Greatest Fighter of All Time still be able to defeat him easily?

In one syllable?

Yes.

[LeeBaby]

Just wondering, Floyd Mayweather and his family (Sr., Roger, etc) consider him to be the greatest boxer ever, better than SRR and Ali.

Now on the other hand all of them consider Pacquiao to be a complete bum. In Floyd Mayweather Sr's recent interview posted here he said outright that Pacquiao has ZERO skill, and is a complete joke of a fighter but the only reason he's winning is cus he's doping.

So let me ask you this, should the "Greatest Fighter of All Time" be able to handle a complete unskilled bum who's simply been taking some performance enhancing drug?

Just to give you an example, I consider myself an alright fighter and I personally would not be afraid to fight a zero skilled complete BUM off the street even if they were on performance enhancing drugs because I still feel they would pose no threat.

So if Floyd is the greatest fighter of all time, why is a complete no skilled journeyman loser bum such a threat just because he took a little something or other to enhance his physique? Shouldn't the greatest fighter of all time match up quite well against a complete bum with zero skill even if that bum is on some steroids?

How bout they both take a blood test, that way we have to greats going at it with nothing in them, just pure talent..

[etlux]

How bout they both take a blood test, that way we have to greats going at it with nothing in them, just pure talent..

The problem with your statement is that the Mayweathers don't consider Pacquiao a "great". So why make him take a test if he's a complete BUM with zero skill. According to them he's not a 'great' so why should there be an even playing field when there already isn't one since Floyd is The Greatest Of All Time and the skill disparity is endless?

[MindBat]

The problem with your statement is that the Mayweathers don't consider Pacquiao a "great". So why make him take a test if he's a complete BUM with zero skill. According to them he's not a 'great' so why should there be an even playing field when there already isn't one since Floyd is The Greatest Of All Time and the skill disparity is endless?

I'm going to assume you already know the answer. But to really bring it home for you, here's the real answer:

Because Arum and Team Pacquiao never thought to bring up those same questions you pose during the negotiations. Much less before the negotiations for the fight started.

In their view, OST's was a fair proposal to make the fight happen. That is, until the excuses from the Pac camp started flying in.

[tomhawq]

I'm going to assume you already know the answer. But to really bring it home for you, here's the real answer:

Because Arum and Team Pacquiao never thought to bring up those same questions you pose during the negotiations. Much less before the negotiations for the fight started.

In their view, OST's was a fair proposal to make the fight happen. That is, until the excuses from the Pac camp started flying in.

same recycled garbage as usual. what you're saying here is you don't have any opinion. you're just going with whatever the mayweathers want you to think.

think about the ts' question for once and stop ****riding. i'll repeat it for you:

do YOU think the greatest boxer ever be able to beat a bum on roids? that's the question and your answer is the same recycled garbage people already knew about.

[etlux]

same recycled garbage as usual. what you're saying here is you don't have any opinion. you're just going with whatever the mayweathers want you to think.

think about the ts' question for once and stop ****riding. i'll repeat it for you:

do YOU think the greatest boxer ever be able to beat a bum on roids? that's the question and your answer is the same recycled garbage people already knew about.

thank you for calling out the *****

[Ragnar Lothbrok]

Just wondering, Floyd Mayweather and his family (Sr., Roger, etc) consider him to be the greatest boxer ever, better than SRR and Ali.

Now on the other hand all of them consider Pacquiao to be a complete bum. In Floyd Mayweather Sr's recent interview posted here he said outright that Pacquiao has ZERO skill, and is a complete joke of a fighter but the only reason he's winning is cus he's doping.

So let me ask you this, should the "Greatest Fighter of All Time" be able to handle a complete unskilled bum who's simply been taking some performance enhancing drug?

Just to give you an example, I consider myself an alright fighter and I personally would not be afraid to fight a zero skilled complete BUM off the street even if they were on performance enhancing drugs because I still feel they would pose no threat.

So if Floyd is the greatest fighter of all time, why is a complete no skilled journeyman loser bum such a threat just because he took a little something or other to enhance his physique? Shouldn't the greatest fighter of all time match up quite well against a complete bum with zero skill even if that bum is on some steroids?

GTFO of NSB & take your common sense with you.

[etlux]

GTFO of NSB & take your common sense with you.

why you mad *****?

[Ragnar Lothbrok]

why you mad *****?

how about you go find a dictionary & look up the word sarcasm.


****.