Mayweather unbeatable?

[deejd]

****in nsb is inhabited by toddlers nowadays.

Great job answering the question. Reminds of somebody who bets around the bush when it comes to testing.

[Bumpin]

The only fighter on the list that would have a chance to beat Mayweather is Martinez. He is just too big and agile. A good big man will beat a good small man 90% of the time. Martinez walks around at 170lbs. It just dont make sense and Mayweather dont make bad decisions when it comes to the fight game.

[The Missing Lin]

The question is valid.

I have a good feeling that you can answer it, though.

Was Lewis-Rahman I a controversial decision?

No.

But what's that got to do with anything?

We're talking about two different fights here.

You're clinging to that question as if that's the only merit that your argument has.

Is that all you got?

[Frogs!]

Great job answering the question. Reminds of somebody who bets around the bush when it comes to testing.

like the other guy said, is that all you have?

[fordhamboxing]

The question is valid.

I have a good feeling that you can answer it, though.

Was Lewis-Rahman I a controversial decision?

OOOMMMMGGGG I've been following the new posts in this thread hoping for something, SOME iota of sanity surrounding two guys that you think you care about but really don't affect your life at all.

Everybody should put what I have in my profile in theirs, we need a separate forum for all Pac or Mayweather talk, really.

[deejd]

No.

But what's that got to do with anything?

We're talking about two different fights here.

You're clinging to that question as if that's the only merit that your argument has.

Is that all you got?

Your buddy decided that Lewis-Rahman I's outcome was the same as Mayweather-Castillo I.

[deejd]

OOOMMMMGGGG I've been following the new posts in this thread hoping for something, SOME iota of sanity surrounding two guys that you think you care about but really don't affect your life at all.

Everybody should put what I have in my profile in theirs, we need a separate forum for all Pac or Mayweather talk, really.

I completely agree... I was contemplating putting your message in my profile... but, I didn't really care because it doesn't affect my life at all, ha. That first paragraph is awesome though!

[The Missing Lin]

Your buddy decided that Lewis-Rahman I's outcome was the same as Mayweather-Castillo I.

My buddy?

Ummm no.

But his point was they were 2 different fights and shouldn't be linked together like you're doing.

I agree with him and that's why I'm asking you to explain yourself further since you say appear to say a lot but don't really have much to say.

Will you break your argument down in detail?

I'm curious to see if you really have anything meaningful to say.

[Frogs!]

My buddy?

Ummm no.

But his point was they were 2 different fights and shouldn't be linked together like you're doing.

I agree with him and that's why I'm asking you to explain yourself further since you say appear to say a lot but don't really have much to say.

Will you break your argument down in detail?

I'm curious to see if you really have anything meaningful to say.

don't hold your breath.

[deejd]

My buddy?

Ummm no.

But his point was they were 2 different fights and shouldn't be linked together like you're doing.

I agree with him and that's why I'm asking you to explain yourself further since you say appear to say a lot but don't really have much to say.

Will you break your argument down in detail?

I'm curious to see if you really have anything meaningful to say.

I didn't link them... he was the one that linked them from a post of mine on rematches before... you and I are arguing the same viewpoint.

Lewis-Rahman I & II is in no way comparable to Mayweather-Castillo I & II. We're on the same page, poopsicle, your guy decided that there was a link between the two and threw it to me.