Mayweather unbeatable?

[The Missing Lin]

I didn't link them... he was the one that linked them from a post of mine on rematches before... you and I are arguing the same viewpoint.

No we're not.

Care to explain why you're linking two separate fights together as if one is a sequel to the other?

Even though he gave him an immediate rematch and won quite decisively. I think that justified his first victory.

[deejd]

No we're not.

Care to explain why you're linking two separate fights together as if one is a sequel to the other?

Again... I never linked Lewis-Rahman to Mayweather-Castillo. You have to ask your friend why he linked those two together.

As far as linking Mayweather-Castillo I to the rematch, both fights had similar action. Usually when "Fighter B" is shafted in judging for "Fighter A", Fighter B prevails in a rematch, i.e. Hopkins-Jones II (B-Hop felt shafted, not boxing, I know), Jones-Tarver II, Augustus-Burton II, Martinez-Williams II.... Sure, not all rematches pan out this way, but I felt that if Castillo truly won that fight and was robbed, he would have proved it in the rematch.

The main point is that when the boxing world was crying robbery, Mayweather gave Castillo an immediate rematch and handled his business. Notice how Jones-Hopkins, Williams, Burton.... even Pacquiao off of a draw and later SD (Marquez), never gave their adversaries immediate rematches.

[The Missing Lin]

Again... I never linked Lewis-Rahman to Mayweather-Castillo. You have to ask your friend why he linked those two together.

I really couldn't care less what the other guy said.

But please explain this...

Even though he gave him an immediate rematch and won quite decisively. I think that justified his first victory.

[deejd]

I really couldn't care less what the other guy said.

But please explain this...

"As far as linking Mayweather-Castillo I to the rematch, both fights had similar action. Usually when "Fighter B" is shafted in judging for "Fighter A", Fighter B prevails in a rematch, i.e. Hopkins-Jones II (B-Hop felt shafted, not boxing, I know), Jones-Tarver II, Augustus-Burton II, Martinez-Williams II.... Sure, not all rematches pan out this way, but I felt that if Castillo truly won that fight and was robbed, he would have proved it in the rematch.

The main point is that when the boxing world was crying robbery, Mayweather gave Castillo an immediate rematch and handled his business. Notice how Jones-Hopkins, Williams, Burton.... even Pacquiao off of a draw and later SD (Marquez), never gave their adversaries immediate rematches."

[The Missing Lin]

"As far as linking Mayweather-Castillo I to the rematch, both fights had similar action. Usually when "Fighter B" is shafted in judging for "Fighter A", Fighter B prevails in a rematch, i.e. Hopkins-Jones II (B-Hop felt shafted, not boxing, I know), Jones-Tarver II, Augustus-Burton II, Martinez-Williams II.... Sure, not all rematches pan out this way, but I felt that if Castillo truly won that fight and was robbed, he would have proved it in the rematch.

The main point is that when the boxing world was crying robbery, Mayweather gave Castillo an immediate rematch and handled his business. Notice how Jones-Hopkins, Williams, Burton.... even Pacquiao off of a draw and later SD (Marquez), never gave their adversaries immediate rematches."

Why is this reply in quotes?

Not your own words?

[Frogs!]

"As far as linking Mayweather-Castillo I to the rematch, both fights had similar action. Usually when "Fighter B" is shafted in judging for "Fighter A", Fighter B prevails in a rematch, i.e. Hopkins-Jones II (B-Hop felt shafted, not boxing, I know), Jones-Tarver II, Augustus-Burton II, Martinez-Williams II.... Sure, not all rematches pan out this way, but I felt that if Castillo truly won that fight and was robbed, he would have proved it in the rematch.

The main point is that when the boxing world was crying robbery, Mayweather gave Castillo an immediate rematch and handled his business. Notice how Jones-Hopkins, Williams, Burton.... even Pacquiao off of a draw and later SD (Marquez), never gave their adversaries immediate rematches."

not smart enough to come up with your own ****?

[skillswin]

the only guy who can beat mayweather is martinez, pacquiao is not smart enough

[LoStranger]

the only guy who can beat mayweather is martinez, pacquiao is not smart enough

Martinez has a chance Pacroid has no chance

[hypodermical]

Manny Pacquaio Is Really All The Phillipines have in terms of a global worldwide star and Floyd Mayweather is a threat to that


African American Boxing The Legacy of Dominance Continues

Sugar Ray Robinson
Henry Armstrong
Joe Louis
Muhammad Ali
Sugar Ray Leonard
Thomas Hearns
Marvin Hagler
Pernell Whitaker
Bernard Hopkins
Floyd Mayweather

The Philippines is a 3rd world country that is smaller than most states. **** your racist sig. How many ****ing global stars came out of poor african countries? ethiopia? zimbabwe? or any poor country? The names on your list are all Americans *******, they all live in the land of milk and honey. Dumbass.

[Check_hooks]

Martinez doesn't even have a single HOFer on his resume and hes older than dirt. Pacquiao is younger than Fraud and has more HOFer on his resume.

They would both KTFO outta Floyd and Amir probably KO's him in the championship rounds. Malingagii and Spadafora both win a wide UD.