Comments Thread For: Andre Dirrell Rips Carl Froch Over "Easy Work" Jibe

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fordhamboxing
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • May 2011
    • 476
    • 42
    • 43
    • 9,407

    #21
    Regardless of whether or not you scored it for Dirrell or Froch there's no way that fight was easy for either guy. Saying otherwise is just illogical.

    Comment

    • vacon04
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2011
      • 3839
      • 99
      • 81
      • 10,658

      #22
      Originally posted by romebyko
      Sorry for the misunderstanding..
      No prob man, it was actually a comment just to say that he shouldn't be saying that kind of crap. Even if he was robbed (which I don't think he was), by saying that he's the last opponent that Froch would want to fight he's actually doing more harm than good to himself. If he's so good then he should return to boxing and challenge Froch again right?

      Comment

      • King Ju-Ju
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jan 2010
        • 6479
        • 147
        • 38
        • 6,758

        #23
        Dirrell def wasn't easy work for Froch but imo he clearly beat him. 7-5 in rounds for Froch was my score. Andre really needs to get his ass in the ring and get busy. He's on his way to having a reputation simalr to the one Kermit Cintron.

        Comment

        • -Spinal-
          Back is broken
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 9328
          • 539
          • 584
          • 17,597

          #24
          Originally posted by fordhamboxing
          Regardless of whether or not you scored it for Dirrell or Froch there's no way that fight was easy for either guy. Saying otherwise is just illogical.
          I agree but if the fight was easy at all, at least one ounce, i'd say it was easy in Dirrell's favor. Froch really looked like he couldn't do shit except land a few jabs and a couple of rights. i'd love to see the punchstat numbers for that fight but at the time Showtime were not doing that yet. On a neutral ground, that would have been Froch's first loss.

          Comment

          • B.U.R.N.E.R
            ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2010
            • 30197
            • 1,346
            • 400
            • 47,475

            #25
            I had it 8-4 Dirrell.

            Comment

            • fdotorres
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Feb 2009
              • 5564
              • 172
              • 910
              • 6,035

              #26
              Originally posted by No Ceilings
              I had it 8-4 Dirrell.
              you had pwill winning against sergio for 13.5 rounds

              Comment

              • TX_BOXNG
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jan 2010
                • 5515
                • 237
                • 26
                • 28,695

                #27
                I had dirrell winnin, but it taught him more to loose, cause he exposed the great king arthur

                Comment

                • -Hyperion-
                  The Best And Fastest Ride
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 14176
                  • 912
                  • 1,378
                  • 35,380

                  #28
                  anyone who gave froch more than four rounds is blind....

                  Comment

                  • fordhamboxing
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • May 2011
                    • 476
                    • 42
                    • 43
                    • 9,407

                    #29
                    Originally posted by EngorgedW/Blood
                    I agree but if the fight was easy at all, at least one ounce, i'd say it was easy in Dirrell's favor. Froch really looked like he couldn't do shit except land a few jabs and a couple of rights. i'd love to see the punchstat numbers for that fight but at the time Showtime were not doing that yet. On a neutral ground, that would have been Froch's first loss.
                    Yeah I definitely agree, I had Dirrell winning myself.

                    Comment

                    • RespekonMyName
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 2795
                      • 240
                      • 12
                      • 24,643

                      #30
                      Originally posted by -Hyperion-
                      anyone who gave froch more than four rounds is blind....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP