Tweet
Regardless of whether or not you scored it for Dirrell or Froch there's no way that fight was easy for either guy. Saying otherwise is just illogical.
-
-
No prob man, it was actually a comment just to say that he shouldn't be saying that kind of crap. Even if he was robbed (which I don't think he was), by saying that he's the last opponent that Froch would want to fight he's actually doing more harm than good to himself. If he's so good then he should return to boxing and challenge Froch again right?Originally posted by romebyko View PostComment
-
Dirrell def wasn't easy work for Froch but imo he clearly beat him. 7-5 in rounds for Froch was my score. Andre really needs to get his ass in the ring and get busy. He's on his way to having a reputation simalr to the one Kermit Cintron.Comment
-
I agree but if the fight was easy at all, at least one ounce, i'd say it was easy in Dirrell's favor. Froch really looked like he couldn't do shit except land a few jabs and a couple of rights. i'd love to see the punchstat numbers for that fight but at the time Showtime were not doing that yet. On a neutral ground, that would have been Froch's first loss.Originally posted by fordhamboxing View PostComment
-
I had it 8-4 Dirrell.Comment
-
you had pwill winning against sergio for 13.5 roundsOriginally posted by No Ceilings View Post
Comment
-
I had dirrell winnin, but it taught him more to loose, cause he exposed the great king arthurComment
-
anyone who gave froch more than four rounds is blind....Comment
-
Yeah I definitely agree, I had Dirrell winning myself.Originally posted by EngorgedW/Blood View PostComment
-
Comment