About Holyfield....
He is so hard to rank, as a heavyweight. He was very inconsistent.
He lost 2 of 3 to Bowe....lost 2 to Lewis. Split with Moorer. Struggled mightily with old Holmes & Foreman. Had a far more difficult time with Bert Cooper than a great heavyweight should.
A lot of his status at heavyweight is based on his defeat of Tyson. That's a tough one as well, because Mike Tyson was not only no longer in his prime, but is also the most overrated fighter in boxing history.
Holyfield is a question mark amongst heavyweight greats....but is undoubtedly great as a lb4lb fighter.
This was a guy who went from dominating the cruisers, to buildng himself into a heavyweight who had many successes in the age of truly big men.
JUYJUY....
What's with this "Catskills Tyson" ? Since when do fighters get ranked according to a SEGMENT of their career, & not the overall view ?
Yes.......nothing's more important than a viewing a fighter at his best, but a guy like Muhammad Ali was amazing at his best, & then still a WINNER years beyond his best. He was able to win major fights beyond his best because he was tough (physically & mentally) & incredibly intelligent inside the ring.
Mike Tyson showed to be a supreme frontrunner, & a clueless fool when things were less than perfect.
He is so hard to rank, as a heavyweight. He was very inconsistent.
He lost 2 of 3 to Bowe....lost 2 to Lewis. Split with Moorer. Struggled mightily with old Holmes & Foreman. Had a far more difficult time with Bert Cooper than a great heavyweight should.
A lot of his status at heavyweight is based on his defeat of Tyson. That's a tough one as well, because Mike Tyson was not only no longer in his prime, but is also the most overrated fighter in boxing history.
Holyfield is a question mark amongst heavyweight greats....but is undoubtedly great as a lb4lb fighter.
This was a guy who went from dominating the cruisers, to buildng himself into a heavyweight who had many successes in the age of truly big men.
JUYJUY....
What's with this "Catskills Tyson" ? Since when do fighters get ranked according to a SEGMENT of their career, & not the overall view ?
Yes.......nothing's more important than a viewing a fighter at his best, but a guy like Muhammad Ali was amazing at his best, & then still a WINNER years beyond his best. He was able to win major fights beyond his best because he was tough (physically & mentally) & incredibly intelligent inside the ring.
Mike Tyson showed to be a supreme frontrunner, & a clueless fool when things were less than perfect.
Comment