Naazim is definitely favoring Floyd with his statements.
The only problem I have with it is he said "Well I felt like what we had in place for Shane (their game plan), everyone is going to want to fight him now. I exposed him. You know how to beat him now."
How exactly did you're game plan expose him? From my recollection Shane didn't win a single round. And Shane turned the "game plan" into kaput after the 3rd round. So I guess what he's trying to say is Shane's track & field game plan in rounds 4 thru 12 was his (Naazim's game plan) as well? I guess I'd believe that if I didn't see all the in between rounds with him trying to encourage Shane to let his hands go and take chances.
Everything else in that video I agreed with. Shane needs to retire. But that one piece, I found it a bit contradicting. If you want a game plan to beat Pacquiao, any logical person would suggest the Morales I or JMM II, not Shane Mosley's feeble attempt. What that fight showed me is that fighting in "survival mode" isn't going to work on Pacquiao.
The only problem I have with it is he said "Well I felt like what we had in place for Shane (their game plan), everyone is going to want to fight him now. I exposed him. You know how to beat him now."
How exactly did you're game plan expose him? From my recollection Shane didn't win a single round. And Shane turned the "game plan" into kaput after the 3rd round. So I guess what he's trying to say is Shane's track & field game plan in rounds 4 thru 12 was his (Naazim's game plan) as well? I guess I'd believe that if I didn't see all the in between rounds with him trying to encourage Shane to let his hands go and take chances.
Everything else in that video I agreed with. Shane needs to retire. But that one piece, I found it a bit contradicting. If you want a game plan to beat Pacquiao, any logical person would suggest the Morales I or JMM II, not Shane Mosley's feeble attempt. What that fight showed me is that fighting in "survival mode" isn't going to work on Pacquiao.
Comment