Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

[VIDEO] Naazim: The debate (who would win between Mayweather and Pacquiao) is over

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Naazim is definitely favoring Floyd with his statements.

    The only problem I have with it is he said "Well I felt like what we had in place for Shane (their game plan), everyone is going to want to fight him now. I exposed him. You know how to beat him now."

    How exactly did you're game plan expose him? From my recollection Shane didn't win a single round. And Shane turned the "game plan" into kaput after the 3rd round. So I guess what he's trying to say is Shane's track & field game plan in rounds 4 thru 12 was his (Naazim's game plan) as well? I guess I'd believe that if I didn't see all the in between rounds with him trying to encourage Shane to let his hands go and take chances.

    Everything else in that video I agreed with. Shane needs to retire. But that one piece, I found it a bit contradicting. If you want a game plan to beat Pacquiao, any logical person would suggest the Morales I or JMM II, not Shane Mosley's feeble attempt. What that fight showed me is that fighting in "survival mode" isn't going to work on Pacquiao.

    Comment


    • #92
      if running away from pac means that pac got exposed, then the "gameplan" or "blueprint" was given way back in the Pac/MAB rematch where MAB ran and ran but didn't win the fight.

      you cannot beat pac by running... you have to exchange with pac like jmm did, or you gotta back him up like morales did

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by KRAFTSMAN View Post
        That why people are wondering why you need extensive tests for a one dimensional fighter?
        I understand your argument and it's somewhat valid. However, it's like someone showing up to take a test and saying they didn't study and are not naturally smart so let them cheat. Just because people believe you are inferior doesn't mean you should be allowed to cheat.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Malicious View Post
          I understand your argument and it's somewhat valid. However, it's like someone showing up to take a test and saying they didn't study and are not naturally smart so let them cheat. Just because people believe you are inferior doesn't mean you should be allowed to cheat.

          why would you want to test someone who is inferior? if you're so much better why is that even on the table?

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by Pullcounter View Post

            why would you want to test someone who is inferior? if you're so much better why is that even on the table?
            Because of a concept called fairness. I see you're not a big believer in this whole ethics thing, though, so carry on.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Malicious View Post
              Because of a concept called fairness. I see you're not a big believer in this whole ethics thing, though, so carry on.
              as it relates to the pac/wifebeater fight... its not about fairness... cause wifebeater brought up OST as a negotiation tactic which has nos turned into an excuse to duck the fight. smart people recognize it for what it is.

              to be fair, everyone would have to take OST... not this witch-hunt *****s and pac-haters are on.

              Comment


              • #97
                come on people don't tell me this fight will get its conclusion from public opinion. if somebody's ass gets beat it should be in the ring. if we get contented with opinions, then the more this fight will not happen. if you're a boxing fan you should push for both fightes to fight in the ring and not ****ride somebody's opinion just because he favors your favorite fighter.

                Comment


                • #98
                  nw *******s have declared that ****m doesnt know what hes talkin bout..of course

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by Malicious View Post
                    I understand your argument and it's somewhat valid. However, it's like someone showing up to take a test and saying they didn't study and are not naturally smart so let them cheat. Just because people believe you are inferior doesn't mean you should be allowed to cheat.
                    That went over his head, just so you know

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Pullcounter View Post
                      as it relates to the pac/wifebeater fight... its not about fairness... cause wifebeater brought up OST as a negotiation tactic which has nos turned into an excuse to duck the fight. smart people recognize it for what it is.

                      to be fair, everyone would have to take OST... not this witch-hunt *****s and pac-haters are on.

                      So his demand for OST with Mosley was a failed attempt at ducking the fight? No, because from the get go Floyd said it was about fairness. It only became a ducking tactic when Manny refused, then agreed but really refused.

                      I believe OST should be the standard and I applaud Floyd for holding that belief as well.

                      Fact is if both sides want the fight compromises need to be made. At this point in time it doesn't look like both sides want the fight, but you can't hold it against someone for wanting a fair fight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP