Comments Thread For: Manny Pacquiao Dominates Shane Mosley To Retain

[deejd]

You're completely missing the point (how ironic). Shane was discouraged in the latter half against Floydie (as well as Vernon and Winky) but he never mailed it in. He was still trying, as feeble as it may have been. He didn't mail it in, put his track shoes on, and just flat out try to avoid contact.

Sucks to be someone who idolizes a person who beats on women and has a habit of breaking laws. But I guess for you people that "thug life" **** is something to be proud of. Meh, to each his own I guess.

Link? I don't recall hearing Shane say this, although I may have just missed it. I did recall him say that his next plan was vacation and relaxation in the post fight conference.

Right because he was really trying as he was getting his face punched around the ring in each of those losses with no clear answer for each. It just happens that when Pacquiao does it, it bares more importance. And you say I'm the one that idolizes. You never followed Wright or the late Forrest's careers nor did you even watch Mosley's fights with them so save face while you can.

[spyvsspy]

The last pages of this thread are garbage. You fools need to stop crying, insinuating, fantasy fighting, etc. STFU all of you and go to sleep...bunch of babies posting trash comments....

[-STALLION-]

The approach from Mosley couldn't come as a complete surprise, as that tends to happen when a formerly great fighter is close to completely shot. His mind becomes all too aware of the risks of opening up, due to the obvious physical decline and the ever increasing list things that he now can't do.
Anybody that spent their money on such an obvious mis-match, should've known what was likely to occur in this pointless fight, complaining about buying into such crap reeks of an unrealistic naivety that borders upon pure ******ity.

Right, thank-you.


I paid for Haye-Harrison, knowing the matchup was pure excrement. I expected the fight to be pure excrement. I guess I bought it 1.) out of car-crash fascination, 2.) because I'm a sucker for any chance to see boxing on my TV and 3.) because the matchup was even less worthy of paying many times over the PPV fee for my usual floor-level view at the MEN Arena.


The fight was pure excrement.


I didn't cry like a baby about paying for it. Because I had only myself to blame for supporting such a sham with my money.



Take responsibility for your part in this, people.

[deejd]

Yeah, but is some random 147 fight Floydie made weight in the sole reason why Team Pac wanted that clause?

Yes, I believe he's clean.

What reasons do you have that Pacquiao is roiding? Did he experience some sort of massive muscle growth ala Barry Bonds or Mark Mcgwire? No. Did he somehow become a power puncher when he wasn't before? No. Again aside from the BS reasons like "Ohh... his head got bigger tee hee" what reasons do you have that he's dirty?

If Mayweather didn't make the 147 lb. weight limit for a fight, then I'd be all for the weight penalty (not $10 million). But he's never failed to make the '47 lb. limit, so if testing is baseless, so is not making weight at '47. That simple.

So what's wrong with testing if he's clean?

I never stated that Pacquiao was 'roiding. Just trying to find out why he's holding up the fight or at the very least, not calling Mayweather's bluff.

[Ryannn]

hardly do i see a ******* put up a sound argument. they almost always turn a blind eye or in most cases genuinely don't know the goings on in the sport and it's rich history. they just blindly parade pacquiao as this unstoppable juggernaut avatar of god that can't be beat because this guy and that guy said so and use corny current pop-culture events (lady gaga) to hurl insults as their argument. they lack the proper tools to form an opinion of their own. comes with the territory when you've only been following one guy, i guess.

look at this pompous little shit.

[PAKYO]

Yep, you've much hit the old nail on the head there, thank you.

Putting his **** in your mouth does not necessarily mean both of you are right.

[badass316]

Right because he was really trying as he was getting his face punched around the ring in each of those losses with no clear answer for each. It just happens that when Pacquiao does it, it bares more importance. And you say I'm the one that idolizes. You never followed Wright or the late Forrest's careers nor did you even watch Mosley's fights with them so save face while you can.

Well he was standing there right? Like I said, at least he tried, as feeble as it may have been. He didn't mail it in and just run like some fairy. It bore more importance because he made a warrior like Shane Mosley scared to fight.

You do idolize. You vehemently defend (quite horribly I might add since your points have more holes than a cheese shredder) someone who beats on women, breaks laws, and retire when the going gets tough (twice).

Oh so now where to the point of "Pacquiao fans don't know **** about boxing" and "Pacquiao fans only started following boxing after the DLH fight?" So I guess it wouldn't matter then if I told you I have both of Mosley's fights with Vernon on my external as well as both of his fights with Winky then right? Ok, cool. Well since you're basically reduced to the "Pac fans don't know **** about boxing" defense, I'm going to assume you're all out of ideas since I consider that the white flag of the *****s. Although it should have been more apparent to me we've reached this point when you started reducing my two or three paragraph responses to two or three lines. A mistake on my part.

[deejd]

Please don't defend Baldomir as a good opponent.

Your anti Pac arguments are just as, if not more, ridiculous than ******* comments.

Not good or bad, but the fact remains he was on a nine fight win streak and had a stellar year and clear size advantage leading up to Mayweather. Did he stand a chance, no, but it's hard to be a can and make it to that level.

Right, because Pacquiao's wins against Clottey and Mosley are outstanding... pathetic.

[deejd]

Well he was standing there right? Like I said, at least he tried, as feeble as it may have been. He didn't mail it in and just run like some fairy. It bore more importance because he made a warrior like Shane Mosley scared to fight.

You do idolize. You vehemently defend (quite horribly I might add since your points have more holes than a cheese shredder) someone who beats on women, breaks laws, and retire when the going gets tough (twice).

Oh so now where to the point of "Pacquiao fans don't know **** about boxing" and "Pacquiao fans only started following boxing after the DLH fight?" So I guess it wouldn't matter then if I told you I have both of Mosley's fights with Vernon on my external as well as both of his fights with Winky then right? Ok, cool. Well since you're basically reduced to the "Pac fans don't know **** about boxing" defense, I'm going to assume you're all out of ideas since I consider that the white flag of the *****s. Although it should have been more apparent to me we've reached this point when you started reducing my two or three paragraph responses to two or three lines. A mistake on my part.

You didn't watch any of those fights because you're dead wrong, especially when it comes to the Forrest fights, the first one in particular. Since you just jumped on boxing in 2008, you saw the Mayweather fight, and Mayweather simply walked down Mosley and cut off the ring since Mosley wanted to run. If Pacquiao knew how to do that, Mosley wouldn't have run around, but he doesn't, Mayweather does.

I'm pretty sure that following the sport of boxing isn't idolizing, yet here's a Pac rider trying to educate me on idolizing. Thanks...? Hahahahaha, you the fights on your external yet your comments about the fights here are wrong... kids.

[badass316]

If Mayweather didn't make the 147 lb. weight limit for a fight, then I'd be all for the weight penalty (not $10 million). But he's never failed to make the '47 lb. limit, so if testing is baseless, so is not making weight at '47. That simple.

Why do you keep bringing up the 147 limit? I mean seriously, do you have trouble comprehending the facts? You do know that the 144 fight was the last fight Floydie had when these negotiations started right? I thought I was crystal clear with my point that it was because of this incident (the not making the 144 weight stipulation) is why the other side wanted the clause. I guess they could have brushed it off, if it was against someone honorable but a person like Floydie? Nah, I would have asked for that same clause myself.

What I wouldn't approve of though is if Floydie made 144 and still Team Pac requests a 10 mil/lb penalty. That would be completely unreasonable. But we live in a real world, and Floydie is a douche and he likes to play by his own rules hence why he came in at 146 and didn't even bother trying to shed the extra 2 lbs.

So what's wrong with testing if he's clean?

I never stated that Pacquiao was 'roiding. Just trying to find out why he's holding up the fight or at the very least, not calling Mayweather's bluff.

Why bother requesting a test aside from the ones the NSAC administer if the guy you're fighting is easy work? I mean ****, if I was Floydie. I would have walked up to Pac's face and said "I know you're on roids but I'm still going to tap that ass." Easy work, easy payday.

And lets try not to be ignorant here, he at least made concessions and agreed to the 14 day window that was "once" good before, but was not good x amount of time after.

He did call his bluff, except when he has the goal posts were conveniently moved, go figure.