Comments Thread For: Manny Pacquiao Dominates Shane Mosley To Retain

[right hand jab]

Whatever dude. You're the one justifying Shane's **** performance because of his past accomplishments.

Fact is, he didn't come to fight. The fight COULD have been interesting if he came through and fought toe-to-toe like he claimed he was going to. Apparently that wasn't even in the game plan, because he was trying to stay at a distance or run from round 1.

The approach from Mosley couldn't come as a complete surprise, as that tends to happen when a formerly great fighter is close to completely shot. His mind becomes all too aware of the risks of opening up, due to the obvious physical decline and the ever increasing list things that he now can't do.
Anybody that spent their money on such an obvious mis-match, should've known what was likely to occur in this pointless fight, complaining about buying into such crap reeks of an unrealistic naivety that borders upon pure ******ity.

[BillyBoxing]

Shane never looked scared against Floydie. He did look like a salt shaker with all that jittery sht he was doing

Because Floyd can't punch that hard...

Btw, I missed something? is it me or Pacquiao hasn't lost a round in 3 fights, but again "looked like ****..."

Pacquiao lost?The fight was closed?

Of course Floyd beat Shane in a cleaner way.
Of course Manny is a more flawed fighter than Floyd.

We clearly saw last night Manny is more elusive, and a bigger powerhouse than Shane, who, last year make Floyd dance YMCA twice...
*****s act like Manny is no threat...I disagree mates.

Clottey and Shane made him look like shiet according to *****s, but Manny won the 24 rounds he had with them no??
Not that bad for a shiet fighter...He had them scared for a reason...Nobody looks good against negative fighters who barely throw some punches.

[Ryannn]

Because Floyd can't punch that hard...

Btw, I missed something? is it me or Pacquiao hasn't lost a round in 3 fights, but again "looked like ****..."

Pacquiao lost?The fight was closed?

Of course Floyd beat Shane in a cleaner way.
Of course Manny is a more flawed fighter than Floyd.

We clearly saw last night Manny is more elusive, and a bigger powerhouse than Shane, who, last year make Floyd dance YMCA twice...
*****s act like Manny is no threat...I disagree mates.

Clottey and Shane made him look like shiet according to *****s, but Manny won the 24 rounds he had with them no??
Not that bad for a shiet fighter...He had them scared for a reason...Nobody looks good against negative fighters who barely throw some punches.

you know when a fighter is great when he doesn't lose a round of a fight, knock his opponent down, and people say he looks like *****.

[nycsmooth]

Mosley'sdone w/that "performance"...pull his license and stop ripping off the public w/such a horrid performance...he'd win the gold if backpedling was a sport...

[deejd]

Lol Judah struggled against a journeyman, that's legit? Mayweather fought Clottey? Lol christ. Pac fought Mosley, Margarito,Cotto and Clottey. Dominated all of them. Mayweather fought Mosley, and despite boxing Mosley's ears off, was almost himself outta there when Mosley rocked him. Revisionist history...nothing about Mayweather's career at welterweight is legit. It's all smoke and mirrors and his cronies eat that bull**** up. No substance whatsoever.

A journeyman that was on a nine year win streak that happened to get the nod in Judah's backyard and the stoppage of Gatti in his backyard before fighting Mayweather. Notice how Mayweather fights guys coming off KO wins. DLH (KO Mayorga, who was bigger), Hatton (KO Castillo, the guy who "gave Mayweather fits"), JMM (KO Diaz), Mosley (KO Margarito, who was bigger and Mayweather "feared" says switchsouthpaw and fellow Pac riders).

Cotto wasn't at welterweight. Clottey and Mosley were. Mosley was leftovers. Stellar, just stellar.

[deejd]

Why does the weight matter, aren't we talking about breaking contracts, in which case Tyler Perry did exactly that.

Okay, what fight did Mayweather compete in where he didn't make the contractual weight of 147 lbs?

[badass316]

Because that's where Pacquiao wanted the fight (147).

Do you believe Pacquiao is clean?

Yeah, but is some random 147 fight Floydie made weight in the sole reason why Team Pac wanted that clause?

Yes, I believe he's clean. What reasons are there to believe he's not? Before Senior opened his ugly face the thought of "PEDs + Pacquiao" was never on anyone's mind. What Pacquiao was doing wasn't something that's never been done before (moving up multiple weight divisions and being successful) it's just rare. A rare feat because special fighters are rare. There isn't a Henry Armstrong that pops up every 5 years, otherwise Pacquiao would just be another good fighter who can move up in weight successfully.

What reasons do you have that Pacquiao is roiding? Did he experience some sort of massive muscle growth ala Barry Bonds or Mark Mcgwire? No. Did he somehow become a power puncher when he wasn't before? No. Again aside from the BS reasons like "Ohh... his head got bigger tee hee" what reasons do you have that he's dirty?

[Pudgemeister]

A journeyman that was on a nine year win streak that happened to get the nod in Judah's backyard and the stoppage of Gatti in his backyard before fighting Mayweather. Notice how Mayweather fights guys coming off KO wins. DLH (KO Mayorga, who was bigger), Hatton (KO Castillo, the guy who "gave Mayweather fits"), JMM (KO Diaz), Mosley (KO Margarito, who was bigger and Mayweather "feared" says switchsouthpaw and fellow Pac riders).

Cotto wasn't at welterweight. Clottey and Mosley were. Mosley was leftovers. Stellar, just stellar.

Please don't defend Baldomir as a good opponent.

Your anti Pac arguments are just as, if not more, ridiculous than ******* comments.

[deejd]

hardly do i see a ******* put up a sound argument. they almost always turn a blind eye or in most cases genuinely don't know the goings on in the sport and it's rich history. they just blindly parade pacquiao as this unstoppable juggernaut avatar of god that can't be beat because this guy and that guy said so and use corny current pop-culture events (lady gaga) to hurl insults as their argument. they lack the proper tools to form an opinion of their own. comes with the territory when you've only been following one guy, i guess.

Very well said. I appreciate this post.

[right hand jab]

hardly do i see a ******* put up a sound argument. they almost always turn a blind eye or in most cases genuinely don't know the goings on in the sport and it's rich history. they just blindly parade pacquiao as this unstoppable juggernaut avatar of god that can't be beat because this guy and that guy said so and use corny current pop-culture events (lady gaga) to hurl insults as their argument. they lack the proper tools to form an opinion of their own. comes with the territory when you've only been following one guy, i guess.

Yep, you've much hit the old nail on the head there, thank you.