Originally posted by BoxeoBoriqua
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Miguel Cotto vs Floyd Mayweathers needs TO HAPPEN NOW!!!!
Collapse
-
Originally posted by (ROY) View Poststop with that bull**** man, put your ego to the side and tell me why you think cotto can beat floyd, imo floyd would beat cotto in his prime but in his prime it would have been more competitive then at this point
Floyd looks invincible because of his cherry picked resume. He has not fought anybody worth a damn at 147... How can you be a fan of the sport, and have NO interest in seeing Floyd vs Cotto?
Cotto has the tools to beat Mayweather. Will I put money on the fight? fack no... But I definitely would not rule out a possibility of the upset.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Throwed View Postcotto had promblems with zab judah,clottey,torres but he would beat mayweather?????? i'm not floyds biggest fan but saying cotto would beat him is just ******
Comment
-
Originally posted by BoxeoBoriqua View Posti honestly do. i like cotto vs a guy who fights like mayweather. i think he is more comfortable vs a guy like him. now ppl are down on paul williams but i think him at his 100 punch a round state of mind would probably prison **** cotto if his chin holds up.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Throwed View PostYou forgot to mention the 3 LOW BLOWS ms cotta hit zab with when he was getting hurt
Also, Why didn't Cotto hit Margacheato, Torres, and Manny low? Because your BS theory is 100% soap opera BS.
The one who hit LOW ALL NIGHT was your idol Chavez. When he tried that shyt with Randall, he got facked up. Even the commentator made a joke about Randall getting stronger as a result of Chavez's LOW BLOW.
Watch Cotto when hit low... He doesn't even react.Tito and Tyson too... No reaction. Judah was playing the "point deduction" game! He knew he was toast.
Comment
-
Originally posted by (ROY) View Postthe problem is people dont see it as styles make fights, they see it like this, if fighter A beats fighter B and fighter C lost or had trouble with fighter B then fighter A will beat fighter C
Comment
-
Originally posted by BorderPatrol View PostAgree that in his prime he stood a better chance... My point is simple: Floyd looked good against Gatti, Baldomir and a faded Oscar who really could have pulled off the draw. Judah gave Floyd fits for the first 4-5 rounds and was winning until he became "Judah" and checked out of the fight.
Floyd looks invincible because of his cherry picked resume. He has not fought anybody worth a damn at 147... How can you be a fan of the sport, and have NO interest in seeing Floyd vs Cotto?
Cotto has the tools to beat Mayweather. Will I put money on the fight? fack no... But I definitely would not rule out a possibility of the upset.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Natedatpkid View PostCotto vs Marg and Cotto vs Pac were ****in classics. Yet all anybody wants to do instead of admiring those ****in warriors going at it is criticize cotto. Not to mention Cotto looks better against Pure boxers like Floyd. Thats when he's at his best. Cotto can beat mayweather. Mayweather don't have the power to hurt Cotto and Cotto won't just stare at him like Mosely did.
Comment
-
Originally posted by (ROY) View Postthe problem is people dont see it as styles make fights, they see it like this, if fighter A beats fighter B and fighter C lost or had trouble with fighter B then fighter A will beat fighter C
AGAIN:
Look at Floyd's resume and ask yourself what on that resume spells invincibility for Floyd? Keep in in perspective. There is a reason why Floyd avoids certain fights.
I have been around too long to get all hyped up about the victims on Floyd's resume.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Throwed View Posttrue but Floyd faced all kinds of Fighters who were better then cotto like JLC,Corrales.Mosely,
Mosley possibly but as far as skills go, Cotto is the more well rounded fighter. Mosley had that speed and pop but lacked a quality jab and head movement.
Comment
Comment