Is there a media bias against Al Haymon fighters?
Collapse
-
-
Talking about after Cintron. He wanted to go back to 147 for whatever reason and try and fight there. There were no opponents and HBO put their foot down to force a rematch.
That fight was no draw by the wayComment
-
Lol, not in any way.
OK you got me, Martinez did blatantly win that ... but tell me at the time, who else was there for Williams to fight?
He tried for Pavlik..
That obviously fell through ...
and
We got Martinez vs Williams 2 in the end, with the better fighter winning...Comment
-
Comment
-
The only thing I disagree with the writer is the part with HBO, Haymon uses his influence to get his fighters better pay than others which that's what every manager or promoter in boxing does but it seems HBO doesn't really put their foot down on that situation, they could do that to Arum because he blatantly milked them and made them look ****** for years but now they seem to have got themselves in with GBP and Haymon's power at the top.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I don't remember a real big negative media backlash when it came to Forrest or Tarver. Taylor got some but that was AFTER he fought back to back Jr Middleweights and didn't really look impressive in said bouts. But, Paul kind of exxagerrated on the extreme negative backlash that those fighters got.
I know Steve Kim really rips Haymon and his fighters. But, he has always said that P-Will was the exception.
The media never really criticize Arreola except if you mean that they talked about his weight.
Bika rarely got criticized as well. Maybe, cuz' he's nothing but a fringe contender.
The only real 2 that got negative backlash maybe more than what they deserved was Floyd and Berto. That is it. But, it was easy to do so cuz' of how they go about their stuff.Comment
Comment