Originally posted by norway
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: One Time or a Hundred, Ali-Tyson Result Never Changes
Collapse
-
Originally posted by jknightx View Postthis argument is silly and redundant because there is no way anyone can prove who would actually win if a fight between a prime Ali vs a prime Tyson.the argument will never end. It is just matter whitch fighter you liked better and you can come up with all sorts of reasons why that fighter would win,.It is an argument that no one can prove or win.
Comment
-
Originally posted by miron_lang View PostCmon mate. we cant base this on assumptions and be subjective.
I admit Tyson did look invincible from Berbick up to the Douglas fight. BUT....... we cannot compare fighters base on potential. we should do it on the actual fights, the way they handle their fights. And ali himself look invincible too before the 3 yr. layoff.
Spinks is a great win but after that he has nothing.
If I my self at the time had known that Tyson was training in bordellos, and with geisha girls and night clubs, (in other words a kid run wild) instead of being in the gym, I'd have put money on Douglas, who, after all had huge physical advantages, a good record, and good incentive.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Danny Gunz View PostJoe Frazier was able to land on Ali fairly often. Tyson was much faster with his hands, head movement, and foot movement.
Now Im not saying Tyson would definitly win, but he would certaintly not be an easy fight for Ali
Comment
-
Originally posted by bdevils View PostPrime Tyson with Cus with him was completely different animal...It's hard to see Ali lasting against Tyson's movement speed n power
This article is ****** anyways. Ali was put on his back by Henry Cooper and Chuck Wepner...the writer says Ali beat up Liston...uhhh when? When they were even on the score cards and Liston hurt his shoulder? Or when Liston took a blatant dive?
And it is really ****** cause Vitali Klitschko dispatches of either of these guys by ko in 7 rounds.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Die Antwoord View Postyou are basing this on what? His amateur record? Cus died like 7 months into Tysons pro career, can you even name someone Tyson beat with Cus in his corner? Im a boxing genius and even I cant think of anyone in the top 100 at that time who Tyson beat with Cus in his corner.
This article is ****** anyways. Ali was put on his back by Henry Cooper and Chuck Wepner...the writer says Ali beat up Liston...uhhh when? When they were even on the score cards and Liston hurt his shoulder? Or when Liston took a blatant dive?
And it is really ****** cause Vitali Klitschko dispatches of either of these guys by ko in 7 rounds.
even on the scorecards? clearly you never watched the fight if you agree with the cards.
steppin' fetchit.
Comment
-
This is what "boxing expert" (mainly Floyds best nuthugger) Lyle Fitzimmons had to say in his article named:
"Erik Morales Main Event an Unnecessary accident"
"Such is the respect due to a veteran like Erik Morales.
But reality is reality.
And regardless of gaudy resume, there’s no way the future Hall of Famer known as “El Terrible” belongs anywhere near a championship-level prize ring this weekend."
This is what I call a great journalist and great prediction....
We can imagine how relevant is a fantasy fight prediction from this clown...
Comment
-
Originally posted by tim horton View Postboxing genius?
even on the scorecards? clearly you never watched the fight if you agree with the cards.
steppin' fetchit.
Atually ive watched that fight several times and it was right about even. There were 2 rounds clearly Listons, and id argue round 5 could be 10-8, but even if you score it 10-9, i had it even.
round 1: Ali
round 2: Liston
round 3: toss up
round 4 toss up
round 5: Liston
round 6: (liston with a hurt shoulder) Ali
So 3 and 4 are a toss up. Id give Ali 3 and Liston 4, and I dont see how anyone can say that either fighter was way out in the lead. Do you also think Ali beat Shavers or Norton in Norton 3?
Comment
Comment