Steve Kim: Maidana-Morales PPV did under 50,000 buys.

[THE REED]

no wonder Oscar didn't care about giving the profits to Japan



DLH: here you go Japan, $7.64

[deanrw]

no wonder Oscar didn't care about giving the profits to Japan



DLH: here you go Japan, $7.64

LMAO that is truly "golden"

Green time

[lfc19titles]

that is really terrible though. Goes to show even with a solid card you can't have a main event like that for a PPV.

exactly, popularity is what gets ppv views, boxers that interest casual fans, neither maidana or morales do that, i feel sorry for anyone who paid for it

what has madiana and morales done in the last 2 years to be on ppv?

[THE REED]

you do not charge additional money on top of the subscription package for a nothing fight in reality. neither boxers are top 10 p4p, it was a prime boxer fighting a shadow of morales at its best

to charge for this fight was a disgrace, sure it was a surprise but you see plenty of good competitive fights without paying the extra ppv charge

maybe some people are happy to pay a large amount for nothing fights but for me only popular fighters who do good numbers and are someone in their division should be on pay per view

I know exactly what the card was, so thanks for a pointless explanation.

I pay for entertainment.

Period.

That was one of the most entertaining boxing ppvs Ive bought in the last 3 years easily.

Me = Happy Customer.

Worth the money... EASILY.

[ИATAS]

no wonder Oscar didn't care about giving the profits to Japan



DLH: here you go Japan, $7.64

[THE REED]

exactly, popularity is what gets ppv views, boxers that interest casual fans, neither maidana or morales do that, i feel sorry for anyone who paid for it

what has madiana and morales done in the last 2 years to be on ppv?

I didn't buy the card for just the headline.

Since when you buy a ppv, you get more than just the headline... I actually took the entire card into consideration.. since that is what I am buying... the ENTIRE card.

[ThePrince]

what a shame, those guys deserve better. Goes to show that not all cards are ppv worthy. It would've been better on boxing after dark, i think at least 800k would've tuned in, probably closer to a mil.

[lfc19titles]

I know exactly what the card was, so thanks for a pointless explanation.

I pay for entertainment.

Period.

That was one of the most entertaining boxing ppvs Ive bought in the last 3 years easily.

Me = Happy Customer.

Worth the money... EASILY.

the numbers suggest otherwise, there was me thinking fans paid for quality

[Mr. Fantastic]

no wonder Oscar didn't care about giving the profits to Japan



DLH: here you go Japan, $7.64

[The Gambler1981]

you do not charge additional money on top of the subscription package for a nothing fight in reality. neither boxers are top 10 p4p, it was a prime boxer fighting a shadow of morales at its best

to charge for this fight was a disgrace, sure it was a surprise but you see plenty of good competitive fights without paying the extra ppv charge

maybe some people are happy to pay a large amount for nothing fights but for me only popular fighters who do good numbers and are someone in their division should be on pay per view

It was either PPV or no TV outlet thus no revenue stream which would have meant a great card would not have took place at all. Which means you would not have seen it either~

It is not evil to make a fight a PPV in fact that is giving the consumer the absolute choice, either you want to pay for it or you do not.