The Guru predicts Wlad vs Peter

[PBDS]

Nice try old man, I've seen you make several comments about how you don't think you can take to see another loss, or about how your trust is broken.

It's funny how selective your memory is, and how quick you like to Flip Flop when confronted about it.

It's not my faut that you and a group of several others are so obsessed over these two fighters that you build a simple sport up to be something bigger than it is.

I specificly remember you telling me you were so upset after the Brewster fight you couldn't bring yourself to watch it a 2nd time.

I have a lot of fighters I like. I just don't hang off their sacks, threaten anyone who critisizes them, or get so emotionally devistated when they lose that I can't watch their fights again.

...I don't have a selective memory at all and I remember exactly what I said. I said I don't trust Wlad enough to expect him to win and not make me nervous as hell when he fights and end up disappointig me. Whats your point? In Bozo world are people not allowed to get emotionaly into it when their favorites fight? Ask the Mexicans on here how emotional they are about JCC. Ask the Roy fans how bad they were upset about his losses. Ask the Tyson marks how bad it upset them when he got smoked by McBride. If your not emotionaly involved with your favorite fighters fights then you may not have a pulse. Lets hear who your favorite heavy of all times is. Lets hear who you really root for today. I know you have favorties that you live and die with but you won't commit to saying it on here because your such an insecure *****. Thats why you won't commit to saying you think Peter will beat Wlad when you have claimed all along that Wlad has a glass jaw. You won't commit to **** and back pedal from anything remotely resembling a prediction. Admit that you have no balls when it comes to taking a loss like a man.

[PBDS]

....Your so ****ing scared to act like you really really like a certain fighter because you can't stand the pain of someone joking you for it or picking on your guy. You won't commit because if they lose you are afraid to see them getting ripped on.

[Bozo_no no]

....Your so ****ing scared to act like you really really like a certain fighter because you can't stand the pain of someone joking you for it or picking on your guy. You won't commit because if they lose you are afraid to see them getting ripped on.

Again, you take all of your insecurities and habbits, and assume them on to me.

You're a flake. You're a 41 year old man who's fanatisism about these two fighters goes beyond having 'favorites'.

You can't deal with people having a different opinion than you, you threaten people who diss them, and you act like it's one of your children doing a dare devil stunt when they go in the ring.

Talking about "shattered trust" and not being able to watch a fight a 2nd time isn't normal behavior.

I have plenty of fighters I like, such as Manny Pacquiao, Diego Corrales, Emanual Augutus, JC Castillo, Bernard Hopkins, Winky Wright, Shane Mosley, but I will NEVER be so upset at one of them losing that I wouldn't be able to bring myself to watch their fights a 2nd time.

My point is what it always is. For a 41 year old man, you're a giant child, and a bitter and woundled little girl.

[beez721]

No offense, but you are and always have been a big Klitschko Nut Hugger.

Isn't this stating the obvious?

anyone who predicts or roots for wlad to win is a nuthugger? lol. the only obvious thing is your hatred towards him

[beez721]

I don't know how well thought out your reasoning is, but we'll find out Saturday.

If Wlad is going to keep Peter off him, he's going to be spending a lot of energy. If he tries to get Peter out of there, he's going to be spending a lot of energy.

If Peter doesn't go anywhere, when's the last time Wlad looked good and dangerous mid to late in a fight?

There are just as many questions about Wlad in this fight.

I don't think much of Peter, but I am sure hoping he gets it done, because there are going to be some of you that will be emotionaly devistated if Wlad loses.

I agree that its a tough one to predict. I'd like to see wlad win but Im slightly favoring peter. that williamson fight still bothers me and it was only 2 fights ago. if wlad looks the same way he will get stopped unless peter's chin isnt as good as we think it may be

[GasPed]

Yah, anyhow, about the fight - if Peter looked even remotely close to a young Tyson (i.e. peek-a-boo, bob and weave, quick feet, quick hands, hands, explosive combos), then I would favour him. But in fact, other than his power (and lack of height), he's the exact opposite. Slow hands, slow feet, no real defense to speak of, no body movement. The only question mark is his chin vs Wlad's stamina. Whichever lasts longer wins. I'm betting on Wlad's stamina.

[vtamh]

There some other things to think about on this fight.

1. when your constantly chasing you opponent around the ring and eating jabs, it doesnt take long to lose some of the sting on your power punches..
2. The Boxer usually/always wins. Peter might be suprised at the chin of Wlad, and become impatient and irratated.
3. Wlad is a great boxer with suprising powerful SHORT punches, peter tries to take this fight inside, he might be done early.
4. The most realistic way to look at it is that Wlads chin is no longer their from his loss to Sanders. Has been down twice since then, one to brewster, and other to williamson.
5. I think Wlads stamina problem was a fluke and a one time event, so if peter thinks he can hang in their and wait, i think hell be outboxed to death.

Final Outcome,,,,, Wlad on cards....

[guru]

See, just when it seems you are being objective, a comment like that sneaks in.

Castillo? Castillo had 8 fights at Heavyweight, and fought to a draw with a very sub par cruiserweight a few years before that.

He was tiny, fought scared, and is NOTHING to bring up in a discussion trying to give Wlad credit for looking good lately.

That was a farce of a fight.

my point on the castillo fight was that wlad looked fine in it, no catsillo is not a top guy, but still better than anyone peter has fought... i only mention it cause roger asked for more reasons and stated that wlad hadnt looked good in 4 years..., theres a reason why i did not mention it in my original post and list of reasons for a wlad win...

[KidBlackie]

[[[ my point on the castillo fight was that wlad looked fine in it, no catsillo is not a top guy, but still better than anyone peter has fought... i only mention it cause roger asked for more reasons and stated that wlad hadnt looked good in 4 years..., theres a reason why i did not mention it in my original post and list of reasons for a wlad win... ]]]
============================

Wlad has won almost every round he's ever fought in so how could you say he hasn't looked good? He pounded on and dominated Shufford, Botha, Mercer, and McCline pryor to the quick Sanders fight. Moreover he beat the hell out of Brewster no matter the strange outcome.

You don't seem to be able to understand and put into words what weaknesses that Wlad does have. Now he's in the ring with the strongest prospect I've seen since George Foreman. Losing to Peter will be no shame anymore than losing to Wlad will derail Peter. These two guys come to fight which is damn sight better than that stable of King's recyclables he calls champs. Most of you guys don't even deserve to watch such a good match. Both these fighters are over your heads.

[Kimmy]

See, the problem here is that Wlad is a little *****. i don't mean that in a bad way but look, he has no chin nor the conifidence to recover from knockdowns and pain. He cuts and bruises too easily and his lennox Lewis style ***** jab is not gonna hurt Mr Peter.
I think Wlad is not gonna have the front to back Peter up and the first decent shot landed by Peter will cause Wlad to lose his cool and game plan.
The little ***** of boxing will hopefully be KO`ed and he'll retire.