Serious Question: Why did Pac ask Floyd to pay a 10 Million per pound weight penalty?

[Alibata]

I wasn't demanding. You were whining about being insulted so I said PM me so u can whine ur ass all u want there. Don't make me laugh fabie. You're on here trying to think of reasonable excuses for Manny because Manny's reasons fail the "I have a brain" test. Unfortunately, precedence is not Manny's reason. Cry me a river. Bawl. Paint it red. I don't care.

muwhahahaha!!! Manny has the excuses? muwahahahaha.... "Mr. He is on steroids, I ain't got no proof but I don't want to fight him because I am paranoid he might be." , Mr. "How can a ordinary fighter become extraordinary", Mr. "I am on Vacation", Mr. "all he has to do is say he wants to fight me..... but he has to take a test first". Mr. "Legacy don't pay bills." weigh out the excuses will ya *****.

[Slick_Rick]

I didn't raise one, I countered yours.

And why not actually answer or attempt answer the question, instead of turning everything about steroids? I mean, have a look at the title....

Though i guess its always on your mind, seeing as you are immersed in your studying of it for 5 years....

[IMDAZED]

And why not actually answer or attempt answer the question, instead of turning everything about steroids? I mean, have a look at the title.

Though i guess its always on your mind, seeing as you are immersed in your studying of it for 5 years....

I responded to your post. It must really hurt you because you keep talking about me. Why not defend your initial post? Oh wait...

[megadeth]

PRECEDENTS are super-relevant. That's the basis for having PROBABLE CAUSE and can see these happening in all levels of sports, politics and the law.

Keep this in mind and then read on.

Mayweather's accusations or allegations just came out of the blue...while his background (precedence come into play again) with run-ins with the law, his family and then some also comes into the play when it comes to CREDIBILITY.

You will talk about Mayweather CREDIBILITY and just ignore Pac's right? Does the fact that Pac is a know adulterer mean anything. The fact that he promised GOD and his wife that he would be faithful to her and then broke it on numerous occasions. How about the fact that he not only CHEATED, but had a out of wedlock child with a prostiture. That, my friend, is precedence enough. If you will CHEAT on ur wife and family, why is it so much of a stretch to think that won't cheat in your sport. I till tell u why. Because it NOT a stretch to think that.

But back to the main topic of the 10 million per pound clause...there are PRECEDENTS of Mayweather skirting around the issue of weight with his "fight" against JMM...thus the clause.

Again, JMM signed a contract and agreed. There was no "skirting". Just as Pac's opponents who signed a catchweight clauses. You might say that JMM was forced because it was 2 days b4 the, but it was still his choice. Just as it was Cotto's choice. He didn't want to put his belt @ a catchweight on the line and gave into pressure from Arum and the WBO and extra money.
Why won't you apply the same standard to Pac as the apply to FMJ??

[Alibata]

Mr. "14 days is of the table. because I don't really want to fight." Manny missed the k-mart 2 day sale I guess or maybe he figured Floyd for a fighter.

[fabie]

I wasn't demanding. You were whining about being insulted so I said PM me so u can whine ur ass all u want there. Don't make me laugh fabie. You're on here trying to think of reasonable excuses for Manny because Manny's reasons fail the "I have a brain" test. Unfortunately, precedence is not Manny's reason. Cry me a river. Bawl. Paint it red. I don't care.

Sane reasoning wherever it is coming from is sane reasoning.

I am neither complaining nor making excuses...the point I am trying to make are standard arguments that apply to law, any body or organization and then some when it comes to PRECEDENCE.

It doesn't have to be coming from Pacquiao's camp and thus this points to me that your reasoning is readily geared towards anti-Pacquiao issues no matter what.

[fabie]

Keep this in mind and then read on.



You will talk about Mayweather CREDIBILITY and just ignore Pac's right? Does the fact that Pac is a know adulterer mean anything. The fact that he promised GOD and his wife that he would be faithful to her and then broke it on numerous occasions. How about the fact that he not only CHEATED, but had a out of wedlock child with a prostiture. That, my friend, is precedence enough. If you will CHEAT on ur wife and family, why is it so much of a stretch to think that won't cheat in your sport. I till tell u why. Because it NOT a stretch to think that.

You're comparing Mayweather's CREDIBILILTY and defending as opposed to Pacquiao's? Ok, this would be interesting......hehehe



Again, JMM signed a contract and agreed. There was no "skirting". Just as Pac's opponents who signed a catchweight clauses. You might say that JMM was forced because it was 2 days b4 the, but it was still his choice. Just as it was Cotto's choice. He didn't want to put his belt @ a catchweight on the line and gave into pressure from Arum and the WBO and extra money.
Why won't you apply the same standard to Pac as the apply to FMJ??

Signed a contract that Mayweather can be overweight...oh, wait isn't this my argument about PRECEDENCE?

We can make it purple instead of RED if you like...

[megadeth]

Mr. "14 days is of the table. because I don't really want to fight." Manny missed the k-mart 2 day sale I guess.

So ignore the fact that Pac declined the 14 days to begin with right?

Or the fact that Pac waited until FMJ said that, and then AFTER it was said he agreed to the 14 days?

Those things mean that Pac wants the right, right? Come on!!!

[Fox McCloud]

My guess is because Floyd's attitude when he didn't make the limit for the Marquez fight was, "**** it, don't care, I'll just pay the penalties"... Pac wanted to make sure that wasn't a possibility in case Mayweather was planning on coming in over 147 to give himself an advantage.

[Slick_Rick]

I responded to your post. It must really hurt you because you keep talking about me. Why not defend your initial post? Oh wait...

Oh yeah, real painful. You responded with turning the arugement to drugs, hmmm.

What exctaly do i need to defend? I said the commission should implement better testing and a higher penalty for cheating on weight then the current "standard"

And you keep avoiding me asking you about your "steroid studying". How close are you to receiving your Doctorate?