Greater RESUME/ATG RANKING; Floyd Jr. or Mike Tyson

[Vasyl’s dad]

ummm floyd has other names on his resume...and even with that said, he has more names on his resume as well. theres no way holmes + spinks = or > than:

baldo
dlh
marquez
mosely
hernandez
corralles
castillo
hatton

that argument is ludicrous.

Just answer the question.

Remember, it was you who brought up "boxing years".


So now, I'm curious as to where you would place the ages of these guys in their "boxing years".


At the time Floyd fought them, they were all at 34 years of age or more.
Baldomir
DLH
Marquez
Mosley


What is their boxing age at that point?
Go ahead.

[Ryannn]

mike had the bigger impact in the sport as the last dominant american hw.

floyd has had a lot more defining wins and would be higher in most people's all time list by the time he retires.

[Rassclot]

Just answer the question.

Remember, it was you who brought up "boxing years".


So now, I'm curious as to where you would place the ages of these guys in their "boxing years".


At the time Floyd fought them, they were all at 34 years of age or more.
Baldomir
DLH
Marquez
Mosley


What is their boxing age at that point?
Go ahead.

LOL owned.

[tonyjones]

[QUOTE=madsweeney;10330683]All I gotta say is mike stepped in the ring with 4 ATG's (granted he lost to two of them) where as Floyd is still waiting for his first. Its tough because of his losses and short "prime" but I give the edge to Tyson for his pre-prison run.[/QUOTE


Are de la hoya and mosely not all time greats???

[Kagami Taiga]

Just answer the question.

Remember, it was you who brought up "boxing years".


So now, I'm curious as to where you would place the ages of these guys in their "boxing years".


At the time Floyd fought them, they were all at 34 years of age or more.
Baldomir
DLH
Marquez
Mosley


What is their boxing age at that point?
Go ahead.

Dude go away with the soundbites...I ve never claimed any of those guys were prime when floyd beat them. That's not even my point. The point is those are the best names on mikes resume and they weren't prime. Floyd has prime fighters on his resume and he has the better overall resume. If up wanna get into a discussion of whose fighters are older, knock yourself out. But that doesn't make mikes resume better. And I think most ppl with common sense would agree.

[Walt Liquor]

still haven't see a real argument for iron mike here. unfortunately, the conversation has taken an ugly turn to where no one is actually looking at these guys over a whole career. floyd has this based on pretty much any criteria and please stop with the spinks top 30 atg stuff already.

spinks made his bones at CW, he wasn't and isn't on anyones ATG heavy list.

[Vasyl’s dad]

Dude go away with the soundbites...I ve never claimed any of those guys were prime when floyd beat them. That's not even my point. The point is those are the best names on mikes resume and they weren't prime. Floyd has prime fighters on his resume and he has the better overall resume. If up wanna get into a discussion of whose fighters are older, knock yourself out. But that doesn't make mikes resume better. And I think most ppl with common sense would agree.

Originally Posted by Rassclot
how was Spinks old?

he was undefeated coming off back to back wins over undefeated Holmes.

in boxing years he was rather old. his career was on a downturn, dont think he was shot but he definitely wasnt prime. it was a good win, does it count for as much as u claim it does? no way.

I never claimed or suggested you said these guys,

Baldomir
DLH
Marquez
Mosley

were in their prime when Floyd fought them.


I'm simply asking you a question based on your comment. Since your claim is that Spinks, at the real time age of 32, was "boxing years" "old",

where do you put the "boxing years" ages of Baldomir, DLH, Marquez, and Mosley?

[Kagami Taiga]

I never claimed or suggested you said these guys,

Baldomir
DLH
Marquez
Mosley

were in their prime when Floyd fought them.


I'm simply asking you a question based on your comment. Since your claim is that Spinks, at the real time age of 32, was "boxing years" "old",

where do you put the "boxing years" ages of Baldomir, DLH, Marquez, and Mosley?

Wats your point of asking? I've never said they weren't past prime, they were. So what? Is that the only ppl on floyds resume? Once again I fail to see your point.

[BoxingFollower]

People can talk about *****s or *******s all they want, but people must understand, the fighter that had the number 1 in denial fans were TYSON, so lets call them MikeTards..

Tyson was overrated, people say Andre Berto only looks so strong is because hes fighting jacklegs, glass jaw fighters, or however u want to put..

Tyson is the exact same way, he fought easy fights, and when he finally did step up to the plate and fight real challenges, he got floored everytime, lol almost..

Buster Douglas put a whooping on Tyson

Evander Holyfield put 2 ass whopping on Tyson, so much the 2nd time that he bit the mans ear off.

Lennox Lewis put a asswhooping to Tyson.

My point is, Tyson fans, just like Mayweather, Pacquiao, and Roy Jones fans, always will have excuses, he was too old, or his trainer had just died, or whatever.

Tyson lost 90% of his big fights

[Vasyl’s dad]

Wats your point of asking? I've never said they weren't past prime, they were. So what? Is that the only ppl on floyds resume? Once again I fail to see your point.

I'm just curious as to where you put their "boxing age".

Why are you so reluctant to answer the question?

So, again,

what is the "boxing age" for Baldomir, DLH, Marquez and Mosley when they fought Floyd?