Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bernard Hopkins was robbed in the Calzaghe fight ....Proof inside.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    I have to admit, those videos are pretty damn convincing.

    If the fight wasnt so awful, I would actually try to score it again...because to be fair I did only see the fight in a stream bad quality.

    Comment


    • #62
      Yep,we all saw Calzaghe win,calzaghe you sad little yank bitches

      Comment


      • #63
        Forza...admit it...no matter how much you overrate the Calzaghe win....and I did think calzaghe won....he will NEVER be ranked higher than Hopkins........and deep down you know that...thats why you resort to overrating the win.....Hopkins drawing (won in most peoples eyes) witth Pacsal at hios age is inifintly better than anything Calzaghe has achieved in his career...

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by King Ghidorah View Post
          Hopkins was effectively aggressive and controlled the pace of the fight....
          I didnt say he wasnt. Im saying the video is edited and biased.

          Again. People should watch an unedited version and just score the fight.


          Everyone agrees it was a close scrappy fight. Therefore it cant be called a robbery.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by -KPB- View Post
            Forza...admit it...no matter how much you overrate the Calzaghe win....and I did think calzaghe won....he will NEVER be ranked higher than Hopkins........and deep down you know that...thats why you resort to overrating the win.....Hopkins drawing (won in most peoples eyes) witth Pacsal at hios age is inifintly better than anything Calzaghe has achieved in his career...
            What the hell are you talking about? Pascal failed to beat an older, worse version of Bhop.

            Are you that rican? Whats wrong you mad tito wasnt good enough to make it to calzaghes record?

            Its not even a big win, Bhop has always been overrated. Hes a big name because the product of American media hyping their boxers.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by The Noose View Post
              To judge a fight without bias you have to see the whole fight. How does anyone know whats been cut has no punches being thrown?

              Thats why watching the unedited fight is all that matters.

              Also a fight isnt scored on punches being landed alone. Ring generalship, aggression, etc all count.
              because i've seen the original and this version and no punches are being thrown. it's only cut out to make it less boring but i guess you think it's a conspiracy. calzaghe must be landing bombs during those moments where no one is doing anything but circling.

              also there's no such criteria called aggression. it's effective aggression. anyone can be aggressive but if you are missing almost all your punches that's the definition of ineffective aggression and is not a good thing. how does calzaghe win using the 4 scoring criteria? i'm still waiting.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Ray Dollars View Post
                Everyone says BHop made JC look bad in that fight (which is true) but he made himself look really bad, he seemed gassed after R3 and started falling to the floor feigning injury to take breathers. If I was a BHop fanboy I'd want to forget that fight rather than watch it in slow motion.
                he only fell to the floor after getting lowblowed(the nerve of hopkins to get lowblowed) and that started in the 10th round. how does that effect the scoring of the first 9 rounds? stop scoring on emotion.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Forza View Post
                  What the hell are you talking about? Pascal failed to beat an older, worse version of Bhop.

                  Are you that rican? Whats wrong you mad tito wasnt good enough to make it to calzaghes record?

                  Its not even a big win, Bhop has always been overrated. Hes a big name because the product of American media hyping their boxers.
                  Ok...so Calzaghe beating Bhop wasnt a big deal then.....so tell me ...what is Calzaghe best win .....Roy Jones.....

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by -KPB- View Post
                    Ok...so Calzaghe beating Bhop wasnt a big deal then.....so tell me ...what is Calzaghe best win .....Roy Jones.....
                    Jeff Lacy.....

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by The Noose View Post
                      I didnt say he wasnt. Im saying the video is edited and biased.

                      Again. People should watch an unedited version and just score the fight.


                      Everyone agrees it was a close scrappy fight. Therefore it cant be called a robbery.
                      i don't agree. i thought hopkins clearly won when i watch the original version. these vids are for people who thought calzaghe landed 220 punches or some nonsense.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP