Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bernard Hopkins was robbed in the Calzaghe fight ....Proof inside.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by daggum View Post
    yeah it says look at hopkins landing this punch. then hopkins lands the punch. it says look at calzaghe missing all these punches. then he misses all his punches. since when did simply pointing out the truth become biased?
    They only watched the 1st 5 minutes.....

    All the vids show all the rounds in its entirety as well as replays and breakdowns in every key moment for both fighters even when Joe was landing punches......

    How is it that biased???

    Comment


    • #22
      He was robbed, yes. Robbed of his **** ******ity that is. Bummed by a Welshman while he feigned injury and ran away for most of the fight.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by daggum View Post
        can you put a video together that makes it look like calzaghe beat hopkins? nope you can't because you don't have enough substance. you could loop the same 3 or 4 clean punches about 200 times but i think people would catch on.
        It even shows the flaws in compubox where that biased idiot MaxKellerman
        always makes statisticla refenrences...

        They don't count punching in the clinch alot times as well as count punches that miss....

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Ray Dollars View Post
          He was robbed, yes. Robbed of his **** ******ity that is. Bummed by a Welshman while he feigned injury and ran away for most of the fight.
          uhhh actually he wasn't a ******. prison time was rough....

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by King Ghidorah View Post
            It even shows the flaws in compubox where that biased idiot MaxKellerman
            always makes statisticla refenrences...

            They don't count punching in the clinch alot times as well as count punches that miss....
            yeah i did my own compubox on the fight and it was a complete joke. in 2 of the rounds calzaghe landed 1 punch and yet compubox had him landing like 20. i was trying to find the punches and they just weren't there. calzaghe tapped hopkins a couple times on the back and the shoulders but surely those aren't clean punches and still it wouldn't be close to 20. if you count those little taps to non scoring areas shouldn't you count the little taps hopkins did to calzaghe in actual scoring areas? compubox is trash and can be easily influenced just like judges. according to them the more you throw the more you will land no matter what.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by bobbito View Post
              This is pretty ******ed...why can't people accept close fights for what they are...Hopkins is a great fighter, but he cries about everything...it'd be different if he aknowledged close fights but said he felt he won...but he literally cries about every fight...
              is a round really close though when hopkins outlands calzaghe by anywhere from a 2 to 5 to 1 margin? not to mention hopkins lands the much harder punches. that's not close to me at all. and there were at least 7 of those rounds.

              Comment


              • #27
                That was a painfully boring fight to watch in real time, I'm not going through all that. It's hilarious what someone would go through because they are butt-hurt that the white guy won.

                I'll rewatch the fight in real time, I don't seem some crybaby pointing anything out, I've been watching fights long enough to score them.

                Comment


                • #28
                  You shouldn't even need that video to show Calzaghe didn't land ***** but arm punches where as Hopkins dropped him and actually hit his face.

                  Any real boxing fan could tell you that. Hopkins won that fight in my opinion. It was close though. But Hopkins definitely won in my opinion.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    The fact that the nard tards are crying 3 or 4 years later is a credit to calzaghe's greatness. He came to America, beat OUR champ, made it look easy and left with the belt.

                    The only judge who didn't have the fight for calzaghe ( she had it a draw at 114-114 ) was chris byrd's sister, a biased black judge that has ruining many careers.

                    The best part about this fight? Calzaghe made it look like a walk in the park.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by daggum View Post
                      yeah i did my own compubox on the fight and it was a complete joke. in 2 of the rounds calzaghe landed 1 punch and yet compubox had him landing like 20. i was trying to find the punches and they just weren't there. calzaghe tapped hopkins a couple times on the back and the shoulders but surely those aren't clean punches and still it wouldn't be close to 20. if you count those little taps to non scoring areas shouldn't you count the little taps hopkins did to calzaghe in actual scoring areas? compubox is trash and can be easily influenced just like judges. according to them the more you throw the more you will land no matter what.
                      Look at Bradley vs Alexander....... If all you looked at was the compubox it would've made thought that Alexander was winning easily.....

                      I knew this shti was flawwed when I saw them use it in a MMA fight one time when they got the numbers wrong for one fighter......

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP