Who Won Pac-Bradley? Post fight discussion STOP MAKING NEW THREADS ABOUT THIS FIGHT.

[Marvellous1]

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/view.php?pg=compubox-juan-manuel-marquez-manny-pacquiao

Compubox doesn't tell the whole story here does it?

[Brother Jay]

Absolutely correct ^^^.

Compubox is meant to be used as a supplement, not a sole source of determining bouts.

The statistics reflect the tempo of a fight, not the true value of a performance.

Its amazing to me that D4thincarnation would cite Compubox to make his case for Pacquiao .. when he has denounced it for years because, according to Compubox, Floyd Mayweather is the most accurate boxer since its inception decades ago.

So Compubox, just like Pacquiao's decisions over JMM, are legitimate only when it benefits the fighter you support, right?

Hahahaha@ Pacfans hating life right now.

They hate life, JMM, Bradley, Teddy Atlas, USADA, and most recently Bob Arum.

Its really just that simple.

[FirePunch]

No. Compubox is and always has been completely and utterly INACCURATE.

Why would we use an inaccurate system to try and make things more fair???

hey weirdo how about you go rewatch some fights and tell us how off the numbers were

you have eyes dont you ? must suck having a donkey brain maybe you and dub should team up and make a dumb and dumber sequel get rich

[Ring Leader]

I really don't see why people think it was a one sided a$$ stomping, HBO crew really does influence many non-critical thinkers...it was a close fight as was Pac-JMM, get over it

[FirePunch]

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/vi...manny-pacquiao

Compubox doesn't tell the whole story here does it?

yeah it does anybody with common sense and eye vision knows how close those fights were just as close as the compubox numbers

next time think with your mind not your heart you might go further in life

[D4thincarnation]

Compubox has no room from human error? Are you honestly ******ed?

Compubox is two HUMANS. There is a lot of room for human error and corruption.

Anyone can double check the stats and get the result overturned if they have not done their job.

[D4thincarnation]

yeah it does anybody with common sense and eye vision knows how close those fights were just as close as the compubox numbers

next time think with your mind not your heart you might go further in life

Exactly close fight, and you could argue if the fight went the other way, but like I said it the begin you would still have to taken into account knockdowns.

[-PBP-]

Only way I would accept this is if the format was something like:

5 ringside judges who don't get to see compubox (same format as now except 5 instead of 3)

2 compubox judges who score on punches thrown and landing percentage ONLY if the system can be substantially modified

For a total of 7 judges.

[gingeralbino]

Anyone can double check the stats and get the result overturned if they have not done their job.

they did that for 1 rd on a thread on here earlier.

It still caused arguments with people saying punches landed that werent counted. btw the "revised" compubox stats for that rd had Bradley landing more than Pac.

Besides, punches landing doesnt determine who won a fight. And if it does end up that way, expect an end of KOs with fighters concentrating on touching each other as many times as possible with their gloves instead of using power

[D4thincarnation]

Hopkins vs Taylor I [Hopkins wins]

Close fight but I think that was the fair decision.