Compubox is meant to be used as a supplement, not a sole source of determining bouts.
The statistics reflect the tempo of a fight, not the true value of a performance.
Its amazing to me that D4thincarnation would cite Compubox to make his case for Pacquiao .. when he has denounced it for years because, according to Compubox, Floyd Mayweather is the most accurate boxer since its inception decades ago.
So Compubox, just like Pacquiao's decisions over JMM, are legitimate only when it benefits the fighter you support, right?
Hahahaha@ Pacfans hating life right now.
They hate life, JMM, Bradley, Teddy Atlas, USADA, and most recently Bob Arum.
I really don't see why people think it was a one sided a$$ stomping, HBO crew really does influence many non-critical thinkers...it was a close fight as was Pac-JMM, get over it
yeah it does anybody with common sense and eye vision knows how close those fights were just as close as the compubox numbers
next time think with your mind not your heart you might go further in life
Exactly close fight, and you could argue if the fight went the other way, but like I said it the begin you would still have to taken into account knockdowns.
Anyone can double check the stats and get the result overturned if they have not done their job.
they did that for 1 rd on a thread on here earlier.
It still caused arguments with people saying punches landed that werent counted. btw the "revised" compubox stats for that rd had Bradley landing more than Pac.
Besides, punches landing doesnt determine who won a fight. And if it does end up that way, expect an end of KOs with fighters concentrating on touching each other as many times as possible with their gloves instead of using power
Comment