Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who Won Pac-Bradley? Post fight discussion STOP MAKING NEW THREADS ABOUT THIS FIGHT.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A you ******? Jabs to the arm don't land and you counted Pacquiao's combinations as one punch. That wasn't a close round

    Comment


    • Another thing to take into consideration is that those watching the fight on tv have a clearer view of the action because the camera's always gives us the best angle.

      Also half the time watch the fights, most of us are drunk. Before I went to sleep last night I watched the 1st 6 rounds of the fight sober, Pacman didn't dominate like I 1st thought. (Though he was slightly ahead).

      Comment


      • What a robbed

        Comment


        • I know because its the Pacman, people's views are not clear and the HBO team made it sound like Bradley was dying in there... but I've watched the fight with foreign commentary (I feel this is the best way cos you can still here the punches but don't get drawn into the hype) and I must say, the rounds were close. Bradley was landing some good jabs and body shots and would stand and trade when Pacman decided to fight.
          Pac was just throwing wild shots and landing 1 in 10 when he would do a flurry.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by J Dubb II 330 View Post
            Close fights can't be robberies.
            Have you ever heard of the term 'close but clear' ?
            Not to mention it wasn't even close in my opinion.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Halls of Fame View Post
              thats a very good point. Cause I could barely recognise Bradley in there, he looked totally confused, he wasnt himself in there.
              You're talking about one half of the fight. What about the other half.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
                You're talking about one half of the fight. What about the other half.
                3 rounds isn't half of a fight

                Comment


                • A B+ level fighter with 2 broken feet managed to Make the so-called p4p king look like an absolute amateur when he decided to box in the later half of the fight as opposed to the mindless slugging that he opted for in the 1st half as well as FORCED Pacquiao to cut his punch output by about 200 punches ( while operating on 2 broken feet!). Now imagine if Bradley had full utilization of both feet for a full 12 rounds and applied his strategy for the later half of the fight from the onset.....we're talking a WIDE Bradley UD victory here. FACTOID.
                  Last edited by ArtThouFurious?; 06-11-2012, 06:50 AM.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
                    You're talking about one half of the fight. What about the other half.
                    other half? I gave Bradley rounds 1,2, 10 and 12 being very generous. And rounds 2 and 12 were close. I dont know how you saw the last rounds but to me it looked like Pacquiao didnt throw a lot of leather anymore. it didnt look to me like Bradley was doing something special, it just looked like Pacquiao wasnt doing anything anymore.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Halls of Fame View Post
                      a prime highly skilled......
                      i stopped reading there! bradley is no where near highly skilled or slick. bradley is a plain jane, straight up and down with no special effects, he's got two things going for him 1. heart and 2. he's prime...he still throws wide and he comes forward. i scored the fight 115-113 pac. but no robbery because i can see a draw as well as a bradley win if your a bradley fan. the fight was a lot more closer than i thought would be.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP