Who Won Pac-Bradley? Post fight discussion STOP MAKING NEW THREADS ABOUT THIS FIGHT.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SCtrojansbaby
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 5951
    • 136
    • 72
    • 12,653

    #7821
    A you ******? Jabs to the arm don't land and you counted Pacquiao's combinations as one punch. That wasn't a close round

    Comment

    • Bushbaby
      Wild Apache
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2008
      • 23513
      • 727
      • 370
      • 32,078

      #7822
      Another thing to take into consideration is that those watching the fight on tv have a clearer view of the action because the camera's always gives us the best angle.

      Also half the time watch the fights, most of us are drunk. Before I went to sleep last night I watched the 1st 6 rounds of the fight sober, Pacman didn't dominate like I 1st thought. (Though he was slightly ahead).

      Comment

      • boogybro
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Sep 2010
        • 218
        • 68
        • 60
        • 7,891

        #7823
        What a robbed

        Comment

        • craigus1990
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2008
          • 1094
          • 116
          • 80
          • 8,010

          #7824
          I know because its the Pacman, people's views are not clear and the HBO team made it sound like Bradley was dying in there... but I've watched the fight with foreign commentary (I feel this is the best way cos you can still here the punches but don't get drawn into the hype) and I must say, the rounds were close. Bradley was landing some good jabs and body shots and would stand and trade when Pacman decided to fight.
          Pac was just throwing wild shots and landing 1 in 10 when he would do a flurry.

          Comment

          • Superflo777
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Oct 2011
            • 1743
            • 68
            • 78
            • 8,312

            #7825
            Originally posted by J Dubb II 330
            Close fights can't be robberies.
            Have you ever heard of the term 'close but clear' ?
            Not to mention it wasn't even close in my opinion.

            Comment

            • BoxingGenius27
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2009
              • 8502
              • 370
              • 463
              • 9,603

              #7826
              Originally posted by Halls of Fame
              thats a very good point. Cause I could barely recognise Bradley in there, he looked totally confused, he wasnt himself in there.
              You're talking about one half of the fight. What about the other half.

              Comment

              • TriggerItch
                racist and proud
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Feb 2010
                • 200
                • 20
                • 19
                • 6,475

                #7827
                Originally posted by BoxingGenius27
                You're talking about one half of the fight. What about the other half.
                3 rounds isn't half of a fight

                Comment

                • ArtThouFurious?
                  Banned
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Mar 2012
                  • 234
                  • 46
                  • 6
                  • 288

                  #7828
                  A B+ level fighter with 2 broken feet managed to Make the so-called p4p king look like an absolute amateur when he decided to box in the later half of the fight as opposed to the mindless slugging that he opted for in the 1st half as well as FORCED Pacquiao to cut his punch output by about 200 punches ( while operating on 2 broken feet!). Now imagine if Bradley had full utilization of both feet for a full 12 rounds and applied his strategy for the later half of the fight from the onset.....we're talking a WIDE Bradley UD victory here. FACTOID.
                  Last edited by ArtThouFurious?; 06-11-2012, 06:50 AM.

                  Comment

                  • Salardo
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Mar 2011
                    • 1364
                    • 135
                    • 1
                    • 7,933

                    #7829
                    Originally posted by BoxingGenius27
                    You're talking about one half of the fight. What about the other half.
                    other half? I gave Bradley rounds 1,2, 10 and 12 being very generous. And rounds 2 and 12 were close. I dont know how you saw the last rounds but to me it looked like Pacquiao didnt throw a lot of leather anymore. it didnt look to me like Bradley was doing something special, it just looked like Pacquiao wasnt doing anything anymore.

                    Comment

                    • jaestix1
                      Banned
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 1735
                      • 92
                      • 2
                      • 1,882

                      #7830
                      Originally posted by Halls of Fame
                      a prime highly skilled......
                      i stopped reading there! bradley is no where near highly skilled or slick. bradley is a plain jane, straight up and down with no special effects, he's got two things going for him 1. heart and 2. he's prime...he still throws wide and he comes forward. i scored the fight 115-113 pac. but no robbery because i can see a draw as well as a bradley win if your a bradley fan. the fight was a lot more closer than i thought would be.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP