Pacquiao Lawsuit: "It was Floyd's camp who told Tim Smith about the FAKE emails"

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ray*
    Be safe!!!
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 44867
    • 1,654
    • 1,608
    • 558,890

    #31
    Originally posted by | THE KING |
    You obviously didn't get the point. Maybe someone here will give you some help..
    Nah, i get it perfect, But this is a court and Team Pac lawyers submit a document pertaining to that, Now you guys are switching it around and saying where is the evidence that "Pac was on drug" but i dont see Team Mayweather submitting documentation to the court accusing pac of that..

    You guys really are something, Then you have that idiotic moron "Lol" saying double standards...What double standards? Are you guys even educated? Really?

    Comment

    • The Gambler1981
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2008
      • 25961
      • 520
      • 774
      • 49,039

      #32
      Originally posted by brick wall
      yeah make it difficult for the defense...isn't that a good reason? read my post again dummy before you muddle up my post with your "i know plenty about the law" bull****s.
      No you said nothing of the sort, keep backtracking though.

      You should follow your own advice since you obviously know zero about how the law works~

      Comment

      • | THE KING |
        A King of Ones Self
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2008
        • 4284
        • 125
        • 253
        • 11,451

        #33
        Originally posted by The Gambler1981
        You have no point because this isn't a court of law.
        You have no point because.. that's not what I was referring to.

        Comment

        • davidoff
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Jun 2009
          • 857
          • 55
          • 27
          • 7,054

          #34
          Originally posted by The Gambler1981
          A court of law is a court of law, sorry that you don't get that concept~
          I appreciate the concept.

          First, there's double standards in that certain posters on here didn't want evidence from Mayweather for his allegations, but they want evidence from Pac right now (contrary to what the courts require).

          And secondly, opinions fall within defamation. So I'm sorry you don't get the concept seeing as you're keeping them distinct.

          Comment

          • | THE KING |
            A King of Ones Self
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2008
            • 4284
            • 125
            • 253
            • 11,451

            #35
            Originally posted by Ray*
            Nah, i get it perfect, But this is a court and Team Pac lawyers submit a document pertaining to that, Now you guys are switching it around and saying where is the evidence that "Pac was on drug" but i dont see Team Mayweather submitting documentation to the court accusing pac of that..

            You guys really are something, Then you have that idiotic moron "Lol" saying double standards...What double standards? Are you guys even educated? Really?
            What are you trying to say? ..

            Comment

            • Chups
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2004
              • 18402
              • 1,835
              • 1,281
              • 52,879

              #36
              LOL@ Teddy Atlas and his rants.


              Pac pls. ask for 50 million dollars not $5 million. I smell a win.


              Comment

              • davidoff
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Jun 2009
                • 857
                • 55
                • 27
                • 7,054

                #37
                Originally posted by Ray*
                Nah, i get it perfect, But this is a court and Team Pac lawyers submit a document pertaining to that, Now you guys are switching it around and saying where is the evidence that "Pac was on drug" but i dont see Team Mayweather submitting documentation to the court accusing pac of that..

                You guys really are something, Then you have that idiotic moron "Lol" saying double standards...What double standards? Are you guys even educated? Really?
                When did you ask Mayweather for his evidence before you decided it was ok to jump on the bandwagon and drag Pac's name through the mud?

                Edit: In case I have to spell it out to you; forget the court of law. Double standards exist in your principles. You accept something blindly from one man despite the consequences it has on the individual it's directed at, yet you require proof from another before you'll contemplate it's accuracy. Principles.
                Last edited by davidoff; 03-30-2011, 12:35 PM.

                Comment

                • The Gambler1981
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2008
                  • 25961
                  • 520
                  • 774
                  • 49,039

                  #38
                  Originally posted by ThePrince
                  Nah, Petrocelli already took deposition from DLH and Schaefer and they had to make a case for why they were convinced of PED use and that was their defense, Pacquiao's head got bigger... that was it. Look it up
                  They have to prove nothing, they only need prove the case against them is full of shit.


                  That is how it works. Don't talk about things you obviously know nothing about.

                  Comment

                  • Ray*
                    Be safe!!!
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jul 2005
                    • 44867
                    • 1,654
                    • 1,608
                    • 558,890

                    #39
                    Originally posted by ThePrince


                    The court is going to ask the Mayweathers and GBP for their evidence for why they were convinced of Pacquiao's PED use to the point they published this in the RING, did video/audio interviews, etc making that claim.

                    Their answer will be 'well... errr, ummmm.... his head got bigger'

                    The judge will reply 'Pay the man'.

                    Case closed
                    In court they would probably show transcripts of any interview pertaining to manny and drug use, they would then probably show is drug test records from all the boxing commission.

                    And anyone caught on tape or on the transcript would be ask how or what evidence they have to think Pac was on anything..So?

                    That doesnt mean they arent going to ask Team Pac how they knew it was team Mayweather that passed on the "allege" email to the papers or media.

                    Comment

                    • Vasyl’s dad
                      He said no rematch
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 23510
                      • 1,120
                      • 1,945
                      • 50,072

                      #40
                      Originally posted by | THE KING |
                      What are you trying to say? ..
                      lol, all of the *****s are like little dust devils, spinning in every way with no direction.

                      lol, "the defense doesn't have anything to prove, its on Mannys team to do that".


                      Sure, no problem, theres over a year of interviews and videos where they clearly say hes using PEDs. Because of them saying that,

                      it cancelled a fight killing Mannys chances of making money.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP