Hmmmm

[Chups]

As opposed to just fighting him. Makes sense.

It's easier to bankrupt Floyd than make him agree to fight Pac.

[IMDAZED]

It's easier to bankrupt Floyd than make him agree to fight Pac.

Logic. You. Fail.

[Ryannn]

Was he in the first negotiations?

And in that case how is requesting non standard testing a roadblock?

he was accused and was asked to prove his innocence by their own terms. he was willing to do that to a degree but not agreeing all the way.

it could have been superstition cause of his last loss, it could have been ego, heck, maybe pacquiao is really on PED's.

whatever the reason is, it stopped the fight from happening.

that's like asking for a catchweight and blaming the guy who refused it if the fight doesn't happen

[Chups]

Logic. You. Fail.

Stop pretending to be unbiased you have been exposed as a pachater for a long time. You ain't fooling anyone.

[Ryannn]

What was stopping him from just doing the Olympic Style tests?

effective ped's that you can take for 7 days before a fight that isn't detectable by urine and not detectable by blood within 24 hours of intake.

[Ryannn]

Stop pretending to be unbiased you have been exposed as a pachater for a long time. You ain't fooling anyone.

iamdazed a pachater/floyd **** mucher?

im shocked!

[IronDanHamza]

he was accused and was asked to prove his innocence by their own terms. he was willing to do that to a degree but not agreeing all the way.

it could have been superstition cause of his last loss, it could have been ego, heck, maybe pacquiao is really on PED's.

whatever the reason is, it stopped the fight from happening.

that's like asking for a catchweight and blaming the guy who refused it if the fight doesn't happen

Well, It's not really the same because a catchweight is more likely to have a negative effect on you than a drug test would.

But either way, in essence if a fighter asks for a catchweight that will have no effect on them I.e Pacqiauo-Cotto. Then yes the person who rejects the catchweight is the person who gets the blame for the fight not happening. Surely? Had Cotto rejected the 145 catchweight who would you put the blame on for the fight not happening?

[AFighter4U]

iamdazed a pachater/floyd **** mucher?

im shocked!

the guy can't even answer a simple question and blames you for it. i mean how ******ed is that?

[Ryannn]

Well, It's not really the same because a catchweight is more likely to have a negative effect on you than a drug test would.

But either way, in essence if a fighter asks for a catchweight that will have no effect on them I.e Pacqiauo-Cotto. Then yes the person who rejects the catchweight is the person who gets the blame for the fight not happening. Surely? Had Cotto rejected the 145 catchweight who would you put the blame on for the fight not happening?

i would blame it on pacquiao. he was the one who asked for something that is "special" and cotto wants the normal weight limit.

this is knowing that both fighters will not be affected by the catchweight.

[jack2x]

No, I don't. That's ******. How old are you?

old enough to hold an intelligent discussion...............if that is not ******ity then your argument regarding pac weight penalty does not hold water.