Hmmmm

[IMDAZED]

1. nobody else came aboard the "clean up the sport" campaign after shane-floyd, yet pacquiao is the only one you are bashing for not taking the test.

2. but you said "pacquiao breaks commission rules" all the time.

1. What does that mean to you? I'm curious.

2. What was that in response to? Your comment about NSAC rules, correct? Can't have it both ways. If Pacquiao can usurp them to create his own, why not Floyd? Further, Floyd isn't asking his opponents to suck themselves down or else their purses are lessened. He's asking for something positive. Well, except to Pacquiao fans.

[Ryannn]

1. What does that mean to you? I'm curious.

2. What was that in response to? Your comment about NSAC rules, correct? Can't have it both ways. If Pacquiao can usurp them to create his own, why not Floyd? Further, Floyd isn't asking his opponents to suck themselves down or else their purses are lessened. He's asking for something positive. Well, except to Pacquiao fans.

1. it means your stand on this issue is hypocritical

2. catch weights have been around even before manny asked for one. belts have been won way before pacquiao even started boxing. and only one fighter was affected for coming down in weight (oscar) and he's the one who asked for it in the first place. so stop with that line of reasoning.

never did i say that floyd was breaking any rules when he asked for extra testing. you are the one who claims that pacquiao breaks commission rules.

so daze, what "rules" are pacquiao breaking?

[IMDAZED]

1. what's the matter, can't answer the question?

2. catch weights have been around even before manny asked for one. belts have been won way before pacquiao even started boxing. and only one fighter was affected for coming down in weight (oscar) and he's the one who asked for it in the first place. so stop with that line of reasoning.

never did i say that floyd was breaking any rules when he asked for extra testing. you are the one who claims that pacquiao breaks commission rules.

so daze, what "rules" are pacquiao breaking?

1. You didn't ask one. Boy, you're reading comprehension...SMH.

2. Catchweights, yes. Instituting your own weight penalty, no.

[Ryannn]

1. You didn't ask one. Boy, you're reading comprehension...SMH.

2. Catchweights, yes. Instituting your own weight penalty, no.

1. got me before the edit.. damnit.

2. so pacquiao is breaking the rules for asking a bigger weight penalty?

[jack2x]

1. The way others followed suit after Tyson & Holyfield used testing outside of commission rules.

2. He's broken weight rules before. The $10m penalty also is his own rule, not a commission rule.

@ 2.....other boxers broke weights rules too in their career.. only difference with floyd and pac is that pac's and his opponent are of the same division when he was overweight while floyd's opponents was 2 division lower when floyd was overweight....so, if we are talking about penalties then blamed floyd bcoz he instituted penalties(overweight) first when he paid jmm for every pound overweight.

[IMDAZED]

1. got me before the edit.. damnit.

2. so pacquiao is breaking the rules for asking a bigger weight penalty?

1. Yeah...what else is new.

2. No, it means stop pretending as if NSAC is perfectly fine when you ignore it when you feel like it.

[IMDAZED]

@ 2.....other boxers broke weights rules too in their career.. only difference with floyd and pac is that pac's and his opponent are of the same division when he was overweight while floyd's opponents was 2 division lower when floyd was overweight....so, if we are talking about penalties then blamed floyd bcoz he instituted penalties(overweight) first when he paid jmm for every pound overweight.

Yeah, Floyd was definitely wrong for that. Agreed.

And no, he didn't implement penalties first.

[Ryannn]

1. Yeah...what else is new.

2. No, it means stop pretending as if NSAC is perfectly fine when you ignore it when you feel like it.

1. changed it. i thought i asked you a question about why you only bashing pacquiao for not taking the non-standard test. so you're gonna ride on this now?

2. ANSWER THE QUESTION: WHAT RULES ARE PACQUIAO BREAKING?

[AFighter4U]

Pac always says in interveiws that he wishes Floyd would get all his legal troubles sorted so that they can fight soon. Yet he is suing Floyd in his own case for Roid name calling so to speak. So how is this 'wishing him the best in his legal issues' when he is ONE of the guys giving Floyd a legal battle. If Pac really wanted to fight soon, he wouldnt be talking about Marquez in November and wouldnt be Suing Floyd just for name calling. I mean, Paulie Maliggnagi said Pac is on Roids, yet he isnt getting suid for it...

I know thread this will be swept under the rug by Pac Stans and Non Boxing fans.

Real Boxing fans know the truth.

Just sayin...

PS I know my spelling sucks..

simple.

Pac is hoping that floyd jr and the others in the suit would come to their senses and not accuse anyone of wrongdoing without any proof whatsoever.

a public apology would most likely take care of that problem. and no. floyd jr apologized to his FANS and never addressed Pac, the person his tirade was directed against.

note that everyone in Pac's case is a high profile personality in boxing, such as floyd jr., floyd sr, Golden Boy, etc. Paul Malignaggi is a nobody. I mean, who listens to him?

[IMDAZED]

1. changed it. i thought i asked you a question about why you only bashing pacquiao for not taking the non-standard test. so you're gonna ride on this now?

2. ANSWER THE QUESTION: WHAT RULES ARE PACQUIAO BREAKING?

I'm riding on what I been riding on while you're searching for some tangent to claim victory.

Manny Pacquiao pulled out of the biggest fight in boxing history because he didn't want to face tougher testing.

What sayeth you? Let me guess...tangent time.