Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Pacquiao vs. Mayweather/Golden Boy Legal Battle Update

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Uh oh...
    "In a written opinion released today, Judge Hicks wrote, “defendants’ alleged statements are actionable defamatory statements because they falsely assert an objective fact: namely, that Pacquiao was using and had used PEDs. First, the court finds that a reasonable listener would understand and interpret the moving defendants’ statements to imply that Pacquiao has used and is using PEDs... Further, the court finds that the alleged statements are presupposed facts not available to a reasonable listener but that a reasonable listener would assume implied actual knowledge of the statement’s truth.” Judge Hicks listed the following examples of statements that would convince a listener that there was proof that Pacquiao took PEDs: De La Hoya’s comparing Pacquiao’s punches as similar to other fighters who have taken PEDs; Floyd Mayweather, Jr.’s statements that Pacquiao’s physical development is a result of the Phillippines having access to the best performance enhancing drugs and also that Pacquiao has “the power pellets, yo, the steroid juice”; and Schaefer’s statement that he “was sure” that Pacquiao uses PEDs. A trial date has not been set."

    Them boys better get those check books ready

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by Donito Nonaire View Post
      Some idiots here still think Pac sued for MONEY, LOL.
      Lol, its understandable that someone that admires a moron would be a moron too.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by PAC&PBFsuck View Post
        I love how you state that someone graduated from Google University, seeing how you spend most of your time on Google. Ohhhhh the IRONY!!!
        I love how I don't know who the **** you are and don't give a ****. Oh the irony indeed... whoever you are.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by ThePrince View Post
          Uh oh...
          "In a written opinion released today, Judge Hicks wrote, “defendants’ alleged statements are actionable defamatory statements because they falsely assert an objective fact: namely, that Pacquiao was using and had used PEDs. First, the court finds that a reasonable listener would understand and interpret the moving defendants’ statements to imply that Pacquiao has used and is using PEDs... Further, the court finds that the alleged statements are presupposed facts not available to a reasonable listener but that a reasonable listener would assume implied actual knowledge of the statement’s truth.” Judge Hicks listed the following examples of statements that would convince a listener that there was proof that Pacquiao took PEDs: De La Hoya’s comparing Pacquiao’s punches as similar to other fighters who have taken PEDs; Floyd Mayweather, Jr.’s statements that Pacquiao’s physical development is a result of the Phillippines having access to the best performance enhancing drugs and also that Pacquiao has “the power pellets, yo, the steroid juice”; and Schaefer’s statement that he “was sure” that Pacquiao uses PEDs. A trial date has not been set."

          Them boys better get those check books ready
          *****s will argue that to death, these morons are legal experts!

          Comment


          • #95
            A Fighter is suing another fighter, what the **** is this gay ****.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by ThePrince View Post
              Uh oh...
              "In a written opinion released today, Judge Hicks wrote, “defendants’ alleged statements are actionable defamatory statements because they falsely assert an objective fact: namely, that Pacquiao was using and had used PEDs. First, the court finds that a reasonable listener would understand and interpret the moving defendants’ statements to imply that Pacquiao has used and is using PEDs... Further, the court finds that the alleged statements are presupposed facts not available to a reasonable listener but that a reasonable listener would assume implied actual knowledge of the statement’s truth.” Judge Hicks listed the following examples of statements that would convince a listener that there was proof that Pacquiao took PEDs: De La Hoya’s comparing Pacquiao’s punches as similar to other fighters who have taken PEDs; Floyd Mayweather, Jr.’s statements that Pacquiao’s physical development is a result of the Phillippines having access to the best performance enhancing drugs and also that Pacquiao has “the power pellets, yo, the steroid juice”; and Schaefer’s statement that he “was sure” that Pacquiao uses PEDs. A trial date has not been set."

              Them boys better get those check books ready
              Just wait we have a lot of lawyers on this site. They will dissect this post and come up with an argument that will prove that Pacquiao indeed is a PED user.

              Paging Atty. Reloaded and Atty. MindBat...

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by ElMeroChingon View Post
                A Fighter is suing another fighter, what the **** is this gay ****.
                That's what the real fans want to know.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by Vegan101 View Post
                  Just wait we have a lot of lawyers on this site. They will dissect this post and come up with an argument that will prove that Pacquiao indeed is a PED user.

                  Paging Atty. Reloaded and Atty. MindBat...
                  It's an opinion. All facts will presented in court. It should be good while it lasts.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by PRBOXINGCOTTO View Post
                    *******s saying pac is a legend lol faking history is not being a legend hes going in the hall of fame so is floyd but neither is a legend
                    butt hurt rican. lol

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by MindBat View Post
                      It's an opinion. All facts will presented in court. It should be good while it lasts.
                      Which will be measured in years~

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP